Who rules the whole world of the Masons. Freemasons in the Russian government - masks not removed

All about one of the most secret and powerful associations in the world

Freemasons are the most closed society in the world. There are rumors about the amazing wealth of the Freemasons, about their powerful influence on world politics, about their involvement in the overthrow of monarchs and revolutions ... In a word, there are more than enough myths around the "free masons". Which ones are true?

Where did they come from

The exact date of the origin of the organization of the Freemasons is known - June 24, 1717. On this day in England the first lodge of "free masons" began its work. The four societies located at that time in London were called the same as the taverns in which their members used to gather: "Goose and Baking Tray", "Crown", "Apple", "Grape Brush". On June 24, they solemnly united and became the Great London Lodge. This day is still celebrated as the main holiday of the Freemasons.

Later, representatives of the nobility, intelligentsia, and businessmen began to join the society of Masons. Belonging to a secret brotherhood has become fashionable. In addition, intellectuals liked the ideas of equality and brotherhood, the desire for spiritual improvement, preached by the Freemasons. Freemasons developed their own rituals and secret symbols, which are still valid today.

What are the goals pursued

Why do we need Masonic lodges at all, what do they discuss when they get together, what tasks do they set for themselves?

As the Freemasons themselves explain, their first goal is to improve themselves and the world around them. Everyone who joined the lodge works tirelessly on himself, helping the other to become better: more educated, tolerant, understanding.

The second important goal of Freemasons is charity. In some states, Masonic lodges include hundreds of thousands of people, many of whom are very wealthy; they open hospitals in Third World countries, provide assistance to the sick, and finance the work of educational institutions.

What is behind their rites

Masons are sometimes called almost a religious sect. Intriguing rumors about the mysterious, beautiful, deeply meaningful rituals of the Masonic lodge lead to these thoughts. For example, the head of the Lodge is called the "Honored Master", they call each other "brothers", it is impossible for an uninitiated person to get to the meeting - in such a secret place and time are preserved. Yet this is not a sect. Moreover, Masons avoid talking about religion. And the mechanisms worked out over the centuries do not allow the Order of Freemasons to turn into a religious sect. For example, the leaders of the lodge are constantly changing - the Worshipful Master cannot remain so for more than three years.

Their secrets

Neither Freemasonry as a whole, nor its individual lodges hide the very fact of its own existence. In addition, any member of the Lodge has the right to declare his affiliation with the Freemasons quite openly.

But he has no right to say the same about other Freemasons - disclosure is under the strictest prohibition.

In a deep secret it is supposed to keep secret words and signs by which the Masons recognize each other, special rituals.

They and politics

Freemasons are believed to rule the world. Most likely, this is a strong exaggeration caused by long-standing rumors of a "Jewish-Masonic conspiracy". Yes, in many countries very influential people are members of the fraternity. However, the Freemasons are not involved in politics - they have other goals. By tradition, almost all US presidents were Masons: it's not for nothing that even dollar bills have a Masonic sign.

In Russia, quite different connections are valued today. Of course, domestic masons would like prominent politicians, oligarchs, and large businessmen to belong to their order. But do politicians and oligarchs need old romantic rituals and philosophical conversations? Do they have time for this? And do they want their names to be mentioned in connection with some secret meetings and projects? It is highly doubtful.

How to get there

As already mentioned, Freemasons have the right to speak openly about their affiliation with the order. If the one who wants to join knows about this, he must take the initiative, no one will invite him, because campaigning is prohibited.

If a person really wants to join the order, but he does not have a single familiar Mason, it does not matter: today you can find information about the lodges on the Internet and apply by e-mail. It will be reviewed. The candidate ("layman") will need 2-3 guarantors, and he will also have to go through the ancient rite of passage, described in detail in the novel L. Tolstoy"War and Peace". Nowadays, the rituals have hardly changed. The members of the lodge vote, and three votes “against” are enough for the candidate to have this path closed forever.

If it becomes clear that a person, striving for the Lodge, pursues material gain or wants to achieve social benefits, then the road there is barred for him. Real Masons strive for one thing: to reveal their spiritual potential and help others.

The privilege of men

Ladies are forbidden to join Masonic lodges. It happened so historically. Although today in some countries they begin to practice "mixed lodges", where women are allowed.

Which celebrity was a Freemason?

It is possible to talk about this only with a certain degree of probability, given the strict secrecy of such data. In Russia, it is customary to refer to Masons, for example, A.S. Pushkin, A.V. Suvorova, N.M. Karamzin, A.S. Griboyedov, A.F. Kerensky, N.S. Gumilyov.

By the way: One of the legends says that Mozart in his opera "The Magic Flute" he spoke about the secrets of the Masonic lodge, for which he was killed. To this day, Freemasons treat this work with special respect. When Mozart's The Magic Flute, in particular the Master's aria, sounds once again at the Vienna Opera, several dozen listeners stand up in the hall, as if by agreement. These are the Masons.

Dedicated to the memory of Metropolitan of St. Petersburg and Ladoga John (Snychev), who blessed my work in studying the subversive anti-Russian activities of Masonic organizations.

Foreword

To understand modern Freemasonry, firstly, it is extremely important to understand that the current forms of activity of this criminal community are very different from the traditional ideas about it. Today's Freemasons rarely wear their mantle. The usual Masonic ritual in our time fades into the background. Most of the "Masonic work" is no longer carried out in traditional Masonic lodges, but in various closed organizations of the Masonic type - the Rotary, Pen, Magisterium clubs, the "humanitarian" orders of the Eagle or Constantine the Great, etc. Masonic ritual , which for centuries served as a camouflage for the political intrigues of free masons, in the second half of the 20th century, to a large extent, lost its significance. In conditions when in all countries of the Western world people came to power, no longer hesitating to recognize their membership in Masonic organizations, the need for a Masonic ritual has disappeared. Freemasonry is turning into a secret political trade union, a kind of international, uniting unscrupulous politicians, financial swindlers, crooks of all stripes, who put profit and unlimited power over people above all else. This secret international is headed by Jewish leaders. Like the CPSU in the USSR, Freemasonry in the West is the backbone of the political system. All major political decisions are prepared and made in the quiet of closed organizations. In a "democratic election", the public is allowed to choose from several candidates presented by the Masonic backstage. It is these candidates who are provided with informational support from television and newspapers, which are practically all controlled by the same backstage. The people in this political system are just an extra in the hands of political intriguers. It is this system of power formation that has been introduced in our country since the late 1980s.

The second thing that is important to note for understanding modern Masonic power is that the Judeo-Masonic structures today are not a monolith, but consist of a number of clans, warring among themselves for power and money. Even in the so-called world government - the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Club - there is an ongoing struggle between Judeo-Masonic clans, orders of various rituals and regional centers of power. This struggle is vividly illustrated by today's events in Russia, where supporters of the Order of Malta and American Freemasonry (Yeltsin, Berezovsky, Abramovich), B'nai Brit and Jewish Freemasonry (Gusinsky, Fridman, Khodorkovsky, Yavlinsky), the Great East of France and European Freemasonry (Luzhkov, Primakov, Yakovlev). All these three ramifications of the Judeo-Masonic power bring grief and destruction to our people, they are all focused on the dismemberment of Russia and the genocide of its people.

In today's Russia there are more than 500 Masonic lodges and organizations of the Masonic type (not including occult organizations and branches of the Church of Satan). Their activities are strictly secret, closed in nature. Most of them are not registered with the authorities, observing conspiracy and Masonic secrecy. Actually Masonic lodges, performing traditional rituals of freemasons, make up no more than a third of the above number.

The lodges of the Scottish ritual are considered the most "solid" part of Russian Freemasonry, most of them are organized by the masters of the Grand Lodge of France. The activities of these lodges are carried out according to old documents, observing the full continuity of the Masonic institution of the XVIII-XX centuries. By 1998, such old Russian lodges of the Scottish ritual as "Astrea", "Hermes", "Northern Lights" and others were renewed, new lodges were organized - "Pushkin", "Novikov", etc. They use ritual documents " the Scottish rita of the "Astrea lodge" of the 18th century and the émigré lodge "Astrea" of the 20-30s of the XX century.

The Great East of France has resumed in Russia the activities of Masonic lodges focused on militant Russophobia and godlessness, and above all the Free Russia lodge, which, according to our information, unites, in particular, several State Duma deputies, officers of the General Staff and the FSB.

In the system of national Germanic Freemasonry, the Russian Masonic lodge "Great Light of the North" is being recreated, working according to the ritual documents of the emigrant Masonic lodge of the same name.

According to some reports, several lodges of American Freemasonry (York ritual) are emerging in Moscow and St. Petersburg. Attempts are being made to root the order of the Schreiners on the Russian land.

In addition to the rituals listed above, recognized in the Masonic world, such "self-made" Masonic lodges (like the "Russian National Lodge") are being created, which are not recognized by real free masons.

In general, according to our rough estimates, the number of members of all Masonic lodges in Russia is at least two thousand people.

A much larger number of members (at least 10 thousand) are listed in the so-called white Freemasonry - organizations of the Masonic type that do not use the traditional rituals of freemasons, but accept the Masonic principles of life and are usually led by real Freemasons. The first place is taken by members of Rotary clubs (there are several dozen of them in Russia). Organizations such as the Order of the Eagle, the Magisterium, Reform, Interaction, International Russian Club, and the Soros Foundation are very characteristic of "White Freemasonry". Figures of "white Freemasonry" consider themselves "the chosen people" (elite), which has special rights to rule over other people. The subversive anti-Christian, anti-Russian work of these organizations is strictly closed and secret.

Agents of influence

The first step of the world Masonic behind-the-scenes to recreate the Masonic network on the territory of the USSR was the operation associated with the search in our country for persons who could become agents of influence. In terms of intelligence services, an "agent of influence" is a citizen of one state who acts in the interests of another state, using for this his high official position in the upper echelons of power - the country's leadership, political party, parliament, the media, as well as science, art and culture. In our work, we will only touch on that part of these individuals who worked for the United States and were trained by the CIA.

Specialists dealing with this problem note a number of characteristic features inherent in agents of influence working in favor of the United States [1].

This is, firstly, the ability to influence public consciousness, society as a whole, or individual official and regional groups (which, in fact, is inherent in all agents of influence).

Secondly, the indispensable inclusion in a certain network. An agent of influence is always just a cog in a complex "policy making" machine, which is controlled according to programs created by the CIA back in the sixties and seventies.

Third, objective assistance in achieving the goals set by the "master", in this case the CIA as a body of the world behind the scenes. At a certain stage, these goals may even be passed off as the corresponding interests of our country, but in reality they are only an intermediate point on the way to achieving the goals of the "owner".

Fourthly, compulsory training, which is conducted by group or individual methods. The forms of education are multifaceted and varied: from ordinary lectures to intimate conversations in a relaxed atmosphere. There are special instructions for this.

Fifthly, belonging to the number of "background" functionaries. The stronger the agent, the deeper it is hidden. These are the "shadowy" from politics, " gray cardinals"They do not rule, but direct, suggest the solution of this or that issue that is necessary for the" owner "and harmful for the country.

Sixth, adherence, most often selfish, to some "universal values" and the achievements of world civilization, behind which, as a rule, is hidden, at best, the absence of Russian national consciousness (national ignorance), and at worst - ordinary Russophobia and hatred of historical values Russia.

The first five characteristics can be very diverse for agents of influence, but the latter is surprisingly the same both for agents of influence brought up by the CIA in the sixties, and for the foremen of perestroika in the second half of the eighties.

The program of activities of agents of influence in the USSR was developed personally by the Freemason A. Dulles, the future director of the CIA. Having become a Freemason while studying at Princeton, Dulles already in the mid-1920s reaches 33 degrees and other Masonic regalia. In 1927, he became one of the directors of the international Masonic coordinating center, a mondialist organization - the Council on Foreign Relations, in 1933 he received the key post of secretary, and since 1946 - the president of this organization. At one of the secret meetings of this council in early 1945, in the presence of the leaders of American Freemasonry, US Vice President H. Truman, Treasury Secretary G. Morgenthau and B. Baruch, A. Dulles said the following: “The war will end, everything will be settled somehow, And we will throw everything that we have, all the gold, all material aid or resources to fool and fool people.

The human brain, the consciousness of people are capable of change. Having sowed chaos there, we will imperceptibly replace their values ​​with false ones and make them believe in these false values. How? We will find our like-minded people, our assistants and allies in Russia itself (emphasis added. - O. P.).

Episode after episode, the tragedy of the death of the most rebellious people on earth, the final, irreversible extinction of its self-consciousness, will be played out, grandiose in its scale. From literature and art, we, for example, will gradually eradicate their social essence, wean artists, we will discourage them from engaging in depicting, researching, perhaps, those processes that occur in the depths of the masses. Literature, theater, cinema - all will portray and glorify the most base human feelings. We will in every possible way support and raise the so-called artists who will plant and hammer into human consciousness the cult of sex, violence, sadism, dissidence, in a word, all immorality. In government, we will create chaos and confusion ...

Honesty and decency will be ridiculed and will not be needed by anyone, will become a relic of the past. Rudeness and arrogance, lies and deceit, drunkenness, drug addiction, animal fear of each other and shamelessness, dissidence, nationalism and opposition of peoples - we will plant all this deftly and imperceptibly ...

We will shake generation after generation in this way ... We will tackle people from childhood, adolescence, we will always focus on young people, we will corrupt, corrupt, defile them. We will make them agents of our influence, cosmopolitans of the free world. This is how we will do it "[2].

At this meeting, the main directions of the struggle against the Russian people were determined, which were subsequently embodied in the official documents of the US government, and above all in the directives of the US National Security Council and the laws of this country.

The directive of the US National Security Council SNB-20/1, approved by US President G. Truman on August 18, 1948, proclaimed: "To carry out fundamental changes in the theory and practice of foreign policy, which the government in power in Russia adheres to ... all about making and keeping the Soviet Union politically, militarily and psychologically weak compared to outside forces outside its control. "

Directive SNB-68, signed by President Truman on April 7, 1950, prescribed: “We need to wage an open psychological war with the aim of causing massive betrayal ... sowing the seeds of destruction ... and psychological warfare in order to provoke and maintain unrest ... We must lead the construction of the political and economic system of the free world.But in addition to affirming our values, our policies and actions must be such as to bring about fundamental changes in the nature of the Soviet system ... it will be cheaper, but more effective if these changes are the maximum result of the action of the internal forces of Soviet society. "

In a circular issued by US Secretary of State J. F. Dulles to American embassies and missions abroad on March 6, 1953, immediately after Stalin's death, it was emphasized: masses in the USSR and satellite countries, but also among the communist parties outside the Soviet Union. "

And finally, the Law on Captive Peoples, adopted by the NOA Congress in August 1959, openly raised the question of dividing Russia into 22 states and inciting hatred of the Russian people.

Since 1947, under the pretext of fighting communism, the American government has allocated hundreds of millions of dollars annually for programs to fight Russia and the Russian people.

One of the main points of these programs was the training of "like-minded people, allies and assistants" in Russia.

Apparently, one of the first such experiences of training like-minded people was an attempt by the American special services to recruit some individuals from a group of Soviet trainees who were in the late fifties - early sixties at Columbia University, among whom were, in particular, the future "perestroika superintendents" A. Yakovlev and O. Kalugin. As the former chairman of the KGB of the USSR V. Kryuchkov noted: "Yakovlev understood perfectly well that he was under close supervision of the Americans, he felt what his new American friends were driving towards, but for some reason he did not draw the right conclusions for himself. He made unauthorized contact with the Americans. , and when we became aware of this, he portrayed the case in such a way as if he did it in an effort to obtain the materials necessary for the Soviet side from a closed library ... "[3]. His other fellow in training, O. Kalugin (the future general of the KGB), in order to evade responsibility, reported on his comrade, who after that was in big trouble. From those times, a photograph of the fifties has survived, published in the émigré newspaper "Russian Voice", on which A. Yakovlev and O. Kalugin are captured in the company of CIA personnel [4].

However, the competent Soviet authorities did not manage to find out then whether the recruitment was carried out or the CIA case did not go beyond establishing familiarization contacts and establishing contacts for the future.

Nevertheless, Yakovlev's behavior in the second half of the sixties - early seventies in many ways corresponded to the requirements that A. Dulles presented to the agents of influence. This, in particular, was manifested in an article by Yakovlev in Literaturnaya Gazeta, where he spoke out sharply against the still timid sprouts of Russian national revival, allowing rough anti-Russian attacks. In fact, Yakovlev called for an administrative reprisal against his bearers, and it immediately came.

In the early seventies, Yakovlev was appointed ambassador to Canada, where he actively maintains contacts with a wide range of people, among whom he developed especially trusting relations with the prime minister, the prominent freemason P. Trudeau. Apparently, it was during that period that the "fraternization" of this figure with the world Masonic backstage took place.

In the 60-70s, surrounded by the top leaders of the Central Committee of the CPSU, a group of agents of influence appeared, which, in particular, included F.M.Burlatsky (until 1964), G.Kh. Shakhnazarov, G.I. Gerasimov, G. A. Arbatov, A. E. Bovin. Disguising their anti-state activities with the usual Marxist phraseology, these party advisers gradually pushed the country's political leadership to make decisions that became the first steps towards the destruction of the USSR. A striking example of such an adviser - an agent of influence, was GA Arbatov, director of the Institute for the United States and Canada, who already held a pro-American position. In the foreword to the memoirs of this agent of influence, published in the United States, Deputy Secretary of State Talbot frankly admits that Mr. Arbatov has become America's friend since the 70s.

Since the late 1960s, A. D. Sakharov and E. G. Bonner have become an important element of the agents of CIIIA influence. Their rampant glorification of the Western political system and their tendentious criticism of the Soviet regime through CIA-sponsored propaganda played a large role in the West's Cold War against Russia. The former physicist, who broke with science, and his wife, the daughter of rabid Jewish communists, took a leading place among other Jewish-Soviet public figures and anti-Russian dissidents, becoming a kind of symbol of opposition to the historical values ​​of Russia, the banner of the struggle for its dismemberment and humiliation.

The aggravation of the activity of agents of influence in our country is associated with the projects of the world behind the scenes carried out within the framework of the Masonic coordinating centers - the Bilderberg Club and the Trilateral Commission. Back in the late fifties and sixties, the secret materials of these centers expressed concerns about the nature of the processes taking place in the USSR. The danger of the revival of Russia on national-patriotic principles, the further strengthening of the influence of our country in the world community, which had sharply increased as a result of the Second World War, was emphasized. Even the theoretical possibility of the consolidation of Russia, which is reviving on a national basis, with the countries of the "third world" caused a feeling of fear in the world behind the scenes, because only such consolidation could stop the predatory use of natural resources belonging to all mankind by the West.

The Masonic futurological organization "Club of Rome", which, in particular, includes Ye. M. Primakov, is developing a report "The Limits to Growth" (1972), which has become widely known throughout the world. The data in this report showed that resources are dwindling at a catastrophic rate and that Western countries are facing the threat of declining consumption.

The new strategic doctrine of the United States regarding the USSR NS DD-75, prepared for US President R. Reagan by Harvard historian Richard Pipes, proposed intensifying hostile actions against Russia. "The directive clearly formulated," writes the American political scientist Peter Schweitzer, "that our next goal is not to coexist with the USSR, but to change the Soviet system. The directive was based on the conviction that it was within our power to change the Soviet system with the help of external pressure."

Another American doctrine - "Liberation" and the concept of "Information War", developed for the administration of President George W. Bush, openly proclaimed the main goal of the Western world to "dismantle the USSR" and "dismember Russia", ordered American legal and illegal structures to exercise control over the state, initiate and manage anti-Russian sentiments and processes in the republics of Russia and establish a fund in billions of dollars. a year to help the "resistance movement".

In the seventies and eighties, the American program for training agents of influence in the USSR acquired a complete and purposeful character. It cannot be said that this program was not known to the Soviet leadership. The facts say that it was. But those people who today with full responsibility can be called agents of influence, deliberately turned a blind eye to her.

The KGB of the USSR prepared a special document on this matter, which was called "On the CIA's plans to acquire agents of influence among Soviet citizens."

“According to reliable data obtained by the State Security Committee, recently the US CIA, based on the analysis and forecasts of its specialists on the further development of the USSR, has been developing plans to intensify hostile activities aimed at decomposing Soviet society and disorganizing the socialist economy. the task of recruiting agents of influence from among Soviet citizens, conducting their training and further promoting them in the management of politics, economics and science of the Soviet Union. In addition, one of the most important aspects of training such agents is the teaching of management methods in the leadership of the national economy. hiding with the costs, to search for persons capable of their personal and business qualities in the future to occupy administrative positions in the management apparatus and to carry out the tasks formulated by the enemy. At the same time, the CIA proceeds from the assumption that the activities of separate, unrelated agents of influence, implementing a policy of sabotage in the national economy and distorting guidelines, will be coordinated and directed from a single center created within the framework of American intelligence. According to the CIA's plan, the purposeful activity of the agents of influence will contribute to the creation of certain difficulties of an internal political nature in the Soviet Union, delay the development of our economy, and conduct scientific research in the Soviet Union in dead-end directions. In developing these plans, American intelligence proceeds from the assumption that the growing contacts of the Soviet Union with the West create favorable preconditions for their implementation in modern conditions. According to statements by American intelligence officers, called upon to directly deal with such agents from among Soviet citizens, the program currently being implemented by the American special services will contribute to qualitative changes in various spheres of our society, and above all in the economy. And it will ultimately lead to the adoption of many Western ideals by the Soviet Union. The KGB takes into account the information received to organize an event to open and suppress the plans of American intelligence "[5].

Programs for the training of agents of influence were carried out in parallel with the development of programs for the dismemberment of Russia and the preparation of the genocide of the Russian people.

Pay attention to the term - it speaks of a well-thought-out, long-term policy, the core of which is genocide "[6].

Today, we can speak with complete certainty about the implementation of many plans developed by the world behind the scenes in relation to the USSR. In any case, by the early 1980s, American intelligence had dozens of assistants and associates in the highest echelons of power. The role of some of them is not yet clear enough, but the results of their activities are obvious and the data on their cooperation with foreign intelligence services cannot be refuted.

According to the data reported by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Latvia, from 1985 to 1992, the West (primarily the United States) invested 90 billion dollars "in the process of democratization of the USSR" (that is, the destruction of Russia). "[7] and agents of influence were paid, special equipment, instructors, literature, etc. were sent.

Formation of the "fifth column"

We do not know with what silver coins and in what amount the masters of the world behind the scenes paid off the agents of influence2, but it is known that it was in the mid-eighties that these agents were sharply activated. In particular, A. N. Yakovlev returns to Moscow on the initiative of G. Arbatov (director of the US Institute), who is closely associated with Western circles, and with the direct support of Gorbachev, who immediately took a key position in conducting anti-Russian processes. It was around him that after a while a number of odious personalities who played a tragic role in the history of our country were grouped: V. Korotich, Yu. Afanasyev, E. Yakovlev, G. Popov, E. Primakov, G. Arbatov.

The circle of these revolutionaries was initially very narrow, but Gorbachev's strong support made them confident.

The CIA is dramatically expanding the scope of its operations [8]. The training of agents of influence is put on the stream. The tasks of the American residency in the USSR are simplified by the fact that the contingent of traitors (mainly from the party apparatus, science and culture), with whom it has to work, acquires a sense of impunity, inspired by high support. Moreover, in the new light of perestroika, ordinary traitors and traitors are presented as fighters for the idea.

Billions of dollars to pay traitors through various intermediary structures (the Public Committee of Russian Reforms, the American Association "National Contribution to Democracy", the Cribble Institute, various foundations and commissions) enter our country.

For example, the Cribble Institute (whose head, in his own words, decided to "devote his energies to the collapse of the Soviet empire" [9]), created a whole network of its representative offices in the republics of the former USSR. With the help of these representations, from November 1989 to March 1992, about fifty "training conferences" were held in various points of the USSR: Moscow, Leningrad, Sverdlovsk, Voronezh, Tallinn, Vilnius, Riga, Kiev, Minsk, Lvov, Odessa, Yerevan, Nizhny Novgorod , Irkutsk, Tomsk. Six instructional conferences were held in Moscow alone [10].

The nature of the instructive work of the representatives of the Cribble Institute is evidenced by the example of the party propagandist G. Burbulis, who until 1988 firmly repeated the theses about the leading role of the CPSU and emphasized "the consolidating role of the party in the perestroika process." After receiving instructions "at Kribble's", he began to constantly repeat that "the empire (ie, the USSR) must be destroyed."

Another brainchild of the CIA, the National Contribution to Democracy Association (headed by A. Weinstein), funded the activities of a number of institutions in the USSR:

1984 - A. Sakharov Institute in Moscow, study of the possibilities of creating a center for human rights and peace problems at the institute.

1986 - the A. Sakharov Institute, the creation of a "free university" for students who reject the Soviet system of higher education.

1990 - Fund of the US Congress, proactive funding of the Interregional Deputy Group of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR [11].

Hundreds of people who made up the staff of the destroyers of the USSR and the future Yeltsin regime, including G. Popov, G. Starovoitova, M. Poltoranin, A. Murashov, S. Stankevich, passed through the network of representative offices of the Cribble Institute and similar institutions. , E. Gaidar, M. Bocharov, G. Yavlinsky, Y. Boldyrev, V. Lukin, A. Chubais, A. Nuikin, A. Shabad, V. Boxer, many "shadow workers" from Yeltsin's entourage, in particular the head of his campaigns in Yekaterinburg A. Urmanov, as well as I. Viryutin, M. Reznikov, N. Andrievskaya, A. Nazarov, prominent journalists and television workers [12]. Thus, in the USSR, a "fifth column" of traitors to the Motherland was formed, which existed as part of the Interregional Deputy Group and "Democratic Russia".

It is reliably known that M. Gorbachev from the reports of the KGB of the USSR knew about the existence of special institutions for the training of agents of influence, he also knew the lists of their "graduates". However, he did nothing to stop the activities of the traitors.

Having received from the leadership of the KGB dossiers containing information about an extensive network of malefactors against the state, Gorbachev forbids the KGB to take any measures to suppress criminal encroachments. Moreover, he does his best to cover up and shield the "godfather" of the agents of influence in the USSR A. N. Yakovlev, despite the fact that the nature of the information about him received from intelligence sources did not allow doubting the true background of his activities.

Here is what the former chairman of the KGB Kryuchkov reports: “In 1990, the State Security Committee, through intelligence and counterintelligence, received from several different (and assessed as reliable) sources extremely alarming information regarding A. N. Yakovlev. According to the Western intelligence services, Yakovlev occupies favorable positions for the West, reliably opposes the "conservative" forces in the Soviet Union and that he can be firmly counted on in any situation. activity, and therefore one American representative was instructed to conduct an appropriate conversation with Yakovlev, directly telling him that more was expected of him "[13].

Not only Ragash, but also other leaders of the Masonic lodges openly told (after the establishment of the Yeltsin regime) how personnel were trained to be introduced to the former socialist countries, and above all to Russia. “It was easy to guess, listening to these stories,” writes an eyewitness to these revelations, “that the Masons have been secretly recruiting citizens of socialist countries who were on long foreign business trips in Western Europe, and above all in Paris. they didn’t sit idly by, they probably carried out the orders of their foreign brothers and recruited supporters. Almost every lodge had its own branches to work with these spiritual defectors "[20].

Since 1989, the Freemasons have been carrying out a wide and even, in a sense, open campaign to promote subversive Masonic ideas and recruit new members in Russia. The so-called "externalization" campaign is being carried out, within the framework of which Freemasons give lectures, reports in large halls, in print, on radio and on television.

In March 1991, Radio Liberty, funded by the CIA, called on the inhabitants of the USSR to establish contact to join the Masonic lodges. The host of the program, F. Salkazanova, provided the address where Soviet citizens could enroll in the Masonic lodge in Paris. This lodge was not simple, but created specifically to "promote the spread of Freemasonry in Russia" and to recreate the "Masonic structure" there. To make this lodge attractive, the Masonic falsifiers called it "Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin" (although someone knows very well that the great Russian poet was not a Freemason). The “brothers” from this lodge, speaking in the program, called for the moral and spiritual improvement of society, considering the USA as an example, which “were based on Masonic principles from the very beginning” [21].

Calls to join Freemasonry on Radio Liberty have generated extensive mail. Letters from Vilnius, Baku, Kiev began to come to the French lodges. And then individual work was carried out with the candidates. After selection and verification, the candidate was "initiated", that is, initiated into the Freemasons.

The Freemasons of France are striving to "lay their stone on the building of democracy in Eastern and Central Europe." This was announced in September 1991 in Paris, speaking to reporters, by the Grand Master of the Masonic Great Orient of France J. R. Ragache. According to him, the members of the Great East are intent to increase the necessary material and financial efforts for this purpose [22]. After some time, the Grand Master came to Moscow, and later visited Petersburg to organize proper Masonic work there. The Grand National Lodge of France operates in parallel. In April 1991, she ordained two citizens of Russia to her ranks, who became the organizers of the Russian lodge "Severnaya Zvezda" [23].

The day before the start of the August 1991 coup d'état, a member of the Pushkin lodge I already mentioned, a Jew who had emigrated from Odessa in 1922 (his name was kept secret), arrived in Moscow from Paris. Eight more members of this lodge came with him to Moscow. Despite the alarming events, this Masonic emissary inaugurates a new Novikov lodge on August 30, 1991. The Masonic Journal of Scottish Ritual hailed the event "under the auspices of the Grand National Lodge of France." "This means," wrote the Masonic magazine, "a step forward in the gradual restoration of blue lodges and the highest councils of Scottish ritual among the peoples of the eastern bloc" [24].

As a result of the anti-Russian coup d'etat in August-December 1991, the plans for the world behind the scenes were achieved. However, institutions for training and instructing agents of influence are not only not dismantled, but are turning into an important part of the power structure of the Yeltsin regime, developing for him a kind of directive programs of activity and supplying him with advisers. In the United States, a legal public center of this structure called "Russia House" was opened, which was headed by the agent of influence E. Lozansky, although, of course, all important decisions were made within the walls of the CIA and the leadership of the world behind the scenes.

Confident in the final victory, Yeltsin no longer concealed his direct connection with subversive anti-Russian organizations such as the American National Contribution to Democracy, to whose leaders he sent a message, which, in particular, said: “We know and highly appreciate the fact that you contributed to this victory "(fax dated 23 August 1991) [25].

The world behind the scenes was jubilant, each of its representatives in their own way, but they all celebrated the key role of the CIA. US President Bush Freemason immediately after the August 1991 coup with full knowledge of the matter and as a former CIA director publicly declared that the coming to power of the Yeltsin regime is "our victory - the victory of the CIA." The then CIA director, Freemason R. Gates in Moscow, on Red Square, conducts his own "victory parade" in front of BBC television cameras, saying: "Here, on Red Square, near the Kremlin and the Mausoleum, I am performing my solo victory parade." ... Naturally, a relationship of master and vassal is established between the CIA and representatives of the Yeltsin regime. For example, in October 1992, R. Gates met with Yeltsin in complete secrecy. Moreover, the latter is not even given the opportunity to use the services of his translator, who is put out the door, and the entire translation is carried out by the translator of the CIA director [26].

The world behind the scenes awards Yeltsin with the title, which is borne by almost every member of the world Masonic government - Knight Commander of the Order of Malta. He receives it on November 16, 1991. No longer embarrassed, Yeltsin poses in front of the correspondents in full attire of a knight-commander [27].

In August 1992, Yeltsin signed Decree No. 827 "On the restoration of official relations with the Order of Malta." The content of this decree was kept in complete secrecy for some time. The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs was instructed to sign a protocol on the restoration of official relations between The Russian Federation and the Order of Malta.

Planting lodges in Russia

Relying on high support, Masonic lodges are growing like mushrooms in Russia. Foreign Masonic functionaries of various persuasions, no longer hiding, come to the country, travel around the cities, organizing their lodges and events there. On September 8, 1992, the Harmony 48698 lodge, a subsidiary of the Grand National French Lodge, was opened with great solemnity in Moscow. The ritual was attended by the great secretary "brother" Yves Gretournelle and himself "honorary brother" Michel Garder, lieutenant and great commander of the Supreme Masonic Council of France. The lodge was headed by G.B.Dergachev. On the same day, 12 Russian profane were dedicated [28]. In the same 1992, the atheistic lodge "Free Russia" (28 "brothers" at the time of opening) appeared, as well as the Masonic Order of the Great East of Russia.

In 1994, the newspaper "Moscow News" (No. 9) reported the registration in Moscow of the Grand National Masonic Lodge, which arose with the assistance of the Grand National Lodge of France. In the Moscow Library of Foreign Literature, the leaders of the Masonic Order of the Rosicrucians built their nest, organizing propaganda lectures and the selection of candidates for the lodge within its walls.

The reviving Russian Freemasonry adopted all the modern features of the formation and development of free masons. Many politicians, entrepreneurs, people of the liberal professions who accept the Masonic principles of life, nevertheless, feel closely within the framework of the traditional Masonic lodges with their special rituals. For this large category, the leaders of Freemasonry create broader, dynamic and not limited to ritualistic rituals organizations (called "white Freemasonry"), pursuing the same goals and acting most often in the form of clubs, foundations of commissions, committees.

Some Masonic organizations exist under the guise of various "spiritual culture" clubs, such as the "Citadel" club, headed by the artist O. Kandaurov, the host of the "Oasis" program on the 4th TV channel "Russian Universities".

Since the imposition of Freemasonry came from the West, then, naturally, the first such organization in Russia was the Rotary International Masonic Club widespread in Western countries, the opening of which was reported on June 6, 1990 in the Vremya television program. Its branches quickly spread throughout Russia, and even two are opening in St. Petersburg. Heads of the administrations of Moscow and St. Petersburg Luzhkov and Sobchak, banker Gusinsky, well-known democratic functionaries M. Bocharov, A. Ananiev, Y. Nagibin, E. Sagalaev and several dozen large and small democrats, the majority from which passed the "school" of the Cribble Institute and similar anti-Russian institutions.

To match "Rotary" and the so-called International Russian Club (IRC), created in 1992. This club was headed by M. Bocharov, already known to us from the activities of the Moscow Rotary club, and P. Voschanov, the former press secretary of Yeltsin. It included a number of well-known persons, for example, Minister of Justice I. Fedorov (again known from the Rotary club), international deputy E. Ambartsumov, member of the Big Europe Masonic commission, entrepreneur Svyatoslav Fedorov, filmmaker Stanislav Govorukhin, former head of state security V. Ivanenko, General K. Kobets, member of the Presidential Council A. Migranyan, as well as a group of others, as they wrote at the time, "no less famous people who did not want to disclose their incognito." According to the charter, the club consists of forty people, and each year no more than a third can be added, and each newcomer is obliged to secure three recommendations. The RTO holds closed meetings and guarantees its members "strict confidentiality of the information received in connection with the club's activities ...". Attention is drawn to the fact that the club is dominated by people who at one time were surrounded by Yeltsin.

“The organizers see the club not as a party, but simply as a place where“ real politics ”is made and where informally, modest but real rulers of the country can easily see each other, discuss the state affairs, and decide the fate of the Fatherland” [29].

On the model of one of the main organizations of the world behind the scenes - the Bilderberg Club - in 1992 its Russian counterpart, the Magisterium club, was created, which at first united about 60 "brothers" in spirit. The key figure in this Masonic underground was the already mentioned J. Soros, who published the article "Big Money Makes History" in the first issue of this club's secret bulletin. The cynical aphorism of this financial speculator reveals both his life credo and the main method of action of the world behind the scenes. The significant role of the Magisterium Club is emphasized by the participation of the adviser to the President of the United States of America B. Clinton on economic issues - R. Reich, who represents the Trilateral Commission in the club. The key figures in the club are the patriarchs of the Masonic movement in the former USSR A. Yakovlev and E. Shevardnadze. Such well-known Russophobes as E. Yevtushenko, E. Neizvestny, A. Sobchak, V. V. Ivanov, I. Brodsky, S. Shatalin and others are represented in the "Magisterium" [30].

Like the Magisterium, in order to achieve Masonic goals, a number of foundations and clubs of lower rank are being created, but they also play an important role in shadow political structures - the role of coordinators of anti-Russian activities. The most typical example of such an organization is the Reform Club "Interaction", which unites entrepreneurs, heads of banking and exchange institutions, high-level government officials, united into one whole by the desire to shape Russia's policy on the principle of "big money makes history." This club is headed by one of the leading figures of the anti-Russian movement, E. T. Gaidar, as well as a number of odious personalities like him - A. B. Chubais, K. N. Borovoy, L. I. Abalkin, E. G. Yasin, A. P Pochinok, EF Saburov, O. R. Latsis, etc. Among the members of the club are B. G. Fedorov, S. N. Krasavchenko, N. P. Shmelev, S. S. Shatalin.

Close to the "Interaction" club is the International Fund for Economic and Social Reforms, headed by S. S. Shatalin. L. I. Abalkin and V. V. Bakatin should be noted among the major functionaries of the foundation.

An analogue of the widespread in the West form of Masonic control over the literary environment - the "Pen-Club" organization, was also created in Russia. It was the so-called "Russian Pen-Center", which immediately turned into a gathering place for anti-Russian forces and united in its ranks ardent cosmopolitan writers and ardent antipatriots. It is quite characteristic that it was the members of this "Pen-Center" who made up the core of the "signers" of the shameful criminal and inflammatory denunciation letter named after B. Yeltsin demanding a brutal reprisal against the defenders of the House of Soviets in early October 1993 [31]. Written in extremist tones, the letter called on Yeltsin to immediately put an end to all dissidents, to ban all Russian parties, to close all Russian press organs, to conduct a speedy trial like a military tribunal over all participants in the resistance to the regime. The corpses of one and a half thousand Russian people have not yet been removed from the streets of Moscow, and the instigators-signers from the "Russian Pen-Center" (among them - B. Akhmadulina, G. Baklanov, T. Beck, D. Granin, Yu. Davydov, D. Danin, Al. Ivanov, S. Kaledin, D. Likhachev, B. Okudzhava, V. Oskotsky, A. Pristavkin, L. Razgon, R. Rozhdestvensky) call for the use of force again, declaring: "Isn't it time to demonstrate it to our young , but already, as we again with joyful surprise were convinced (after the murder of 1,500 people. - O. P.), a sufficiently strengthened democracy? " Is this an atypical reaction of the Masonic cosmopolitan worldview, which constantly feels a panic fear of the elements of the Russian people?

The most resolute supporters of the shooting of the White House to suppress the resistance of the Russian people were such leaders of Masonic structures as Gaidar, Chernomyrdin, Luzhkov and Yavlinsky. The first three personally directed punitive operations against the Russian people. "No negotiations!" Chernomyrdin, one of the managers of the world backstage, shouted into the microphone. "We must kill this gang!" [32] Another representative of the international Masonic movement, Yavlinsky, insisted that "the president show maximum cruelty and firmness in suppression" [33]. The Commander of the Order of Malta B. Berezovsky allocated significant sums to pay for the mercenaries who participated in the suppression of the uprising. V. Gusinsky, a member of the B'nai-Brit order and the Rotary club, not only allocated money for punitive operations, but also financed the Beitar Jewish gangs.

In 1993, another organization of the Masonic type was created - the Order of the Eagle. According to the charter, it unites "on the basis of common interest" "the best people", develops a system of elite ties for the implementation of political and economic goals.

Hiding behind the name of the award organization (claiming to coordinate all state award activities), the Order of the Eagle aims to take control of all influential political and economic forces. A person who enters the Order of the Eagle pays membership fees, and the awarding organization promises to create certain benefits, privileges, payments.

According to the master of this order, RB Begishev, the Order of the Eagle "can be regarded as a financial institution with formalized, elite and specially designed business communications (or connections). This is serious capital. The source of this capital is the" everyday "connections of the members of the organization. of these links are objectively a commodity. The price of such a commodity is usually determined by the volume of paid services rendered through a system of constructed links "[34]. The Order of the Eagle publishes a closed (secret) telephone directory "The Best People of Russia", considering it as a way to give members of the Order "the opportunity to practically take advantage of personally the benefits of specially designed communications."

Members of the Order of the Eagle have special order plastic credit cards, with the help of which allowances, bonifications, and mutual settlements are calculated. They are a symbol of membership in the order and "an attribute of belonging to the elite."

The order is managed by the Board (Chapter) and the Executive Committee (Magistrate). Membership in the order is collective and individual.

Among the main founders of the Order of the Eagle were the well-known financial swindler, the head of the Stolichny bank, A. Smolensky, previously convicted under a criminal article, his colleague banker P. Nakhmanovich [35], the agent of influence of the world behind the scenes P. Bunich, the new Russian businessman V. Neverov, one of the leaders of the international Masonic movement M. Shakkum, as well as such anti-Russian figures as the chess player G. Kasparov, S. Solovyov, sculptor Z. Tsereteli, editor-in-chief of "Economics and Life", a member of the Masonic club "Interaction" of Yu. Yakutia.

From the very first "successes" of the broad revival of Freemasonry in Russia, the Russian "brothers" began to prepare a gift for their foreign bosses - the return to the West of the Masonic archives collected by Hitler during the occupation of Europe and taken away by Soviet troops as a trophy. With the support of Yakovlev and Shevardnadze, the director of the institution where the Masonic archives were kept, Prokopenko, a great admirer of Freemasonry, is carrying out all the preparatory work for transferring them to the West. In deep secrecy, A. Kozyrev enters into a secret agreement with the interested parties on the transfer of the legitimate trophy of the Russian people, for which he paid with his own blood.

As one of the leading leaders of the world behind the scenes, a member of the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Club, the head of the Jewish B'nai B'rith order, closely associated with the CIA, G. Kissinger wrote: it into a single, strong, centralized state. " And his colleague in the Masonic order "B'nai-Brit" Z. Brzezinski said harshly: "Russia will be fragmented and under guardianship." Masonic conspirators are developing a variety of plans for the weakening and dismemberment of Russia. Among these plans is the destruction of the Russian economy and its transformation into an appendage of the economic systems of Western countries. It was for this purpose that the so-called privatization of state property and the liberalization of prices were carried out on the recommendations of Western advisers, which set the country's economy back several decades and caused the death and suffering of many millions of people.

The world's Masonic backstage pays the closest attention to the selection of cadres of Russian leaders both in politics and in the economy. The current democratic leaders of Russia either belong to the Masonic structures themselves, or unconditionally accept all their conditions (exceptions are extremely rare). But today the world behind the scenes is no longer worried about the current, but the future leaders of Russia. In search of faithful and capable servants, she creates not only clubs, foundations and commissions, but also political parties and associations, ready to fulfill their goals.

At the end of 1993, two political associations were created to achieve Masonic goals. These are electoral blocs "Russia's Choice" (it would be more correct to say - main choice world backstage) and "Yavlinsky - Boldyrev - Lukin" ("Yabloko" - the second choice of the world behind the scenes). The Choice of Russia, for example, was founded by the leaders and members of such influential Masonic and anti-Russian formations as the Magisterium club (A. N. Yakovlev), the Interaction club (E. T. Gaidar, P. Filippov), the commission " Greater Europe "(G. E. Burbulis, G. Yakunin, A. Chubais). Its activists were the old cadres of agents of influence A. Shabad, L. Ponomarev, S. Kovalev and others. Associated with mondialist centers abroad, this organization received comprehensive support from them. Again "big money makes history." For the December 1993 campaign alone, Russia's Choice received about 2 billion rubles, a significant part of which was provided by the world behind the scenes (through various intermediary commercial structures). To voice the anti-Russian plans of Gaidar, Burbulis, Chubais, Kozyrev, Poltoranin and others like them and give them a decent look, hundreds of American specialists "worked", filming special films and clips. Western media and intelligence agencies have made every effort to support the henchmen of the world government, but they still failed.

Less was spent on the alternate choice of the world backstage "Yavlinsky - Boldyrev - Lukin", but still the lion's share of all Yabloko's expenses was financed from abroad [36]. Lukin alone personally brought 10 million rubles from the United States for these purposes.

The failure of Russia's Choice made the Yavlinsky bloc the new favorite of the world government. Since 1996, the same Western as well as Russian democratic media outlets, especially the TV program "Itogi" on the NTV channel (sponsored by the vice-president of the Rotary club, banker Gusinsky [37]), obedient to the baton of an invisible conductor, have reoriented themselves from "Choice Russia "on the Yavlinsky bloc and carried out obsessive mental processing and the creation of a winning image of G. Yavlinsky. Western companies made a film about the life of this political cheat, who served both Gorbachev and Yeltsin faithfully.

Of course, the tasks posed by the world behind the scenes for the current and future leaders of Russia are colossal. On the agenda is the program of the dismemberment of Russia and the transfer of a number of Russian territories to foreign states:

Kaliningrad region - Germany, part of the Leningrad region and Karelia - Finland, part of the Pskov region - Estonia, a number of Far Eastern territories - Japan, most of Siberia - the United States.

Even the question of a possible occupation of Russia under the pretext of control by the "world community" (more correctly by the world government) over its nuclear arsenals is quite definitely being worked out.

As a first step towards the implementation of these extreme and dangerous plans of the world behind the scenes, Masonic elaborations of the idea of ​​a so-called Europe without borders, or Greater Europe, became. In June 1992, under the "roof" of the Council of Europe and under the patronage of its Secretary General Catherine Lalumiere, the colloquium "Social Rights of a Citizen of Europe" was held, which was actually a purely Masonic event aimed at uniting Freemasonry under the motto "Europe without Borders". As the program showed, the event was organized by the Grand Orient of France, the Grand Lodge of France, the Grand Lodge of Turkey, the Grand Symbolic Lodge of Spain, the Grand Symbolic Lodge of Memphis and Misraim, the Grand Lodge of Italy and a number of other Masonic organizations. Russian Masons were also represented at the colloquium. Among those invited from Russia under the program were A. Sobchak, a former assistant to M. Gorbachev and a former executive officer of the Central Committee of the CPSU. Grachev, member of the editorial board of "Moscow News" A. Gelman, Yeltsin's advisor Vladimir Kolosov [38].

A year later, a new international Masonic meeting was convened in almost the same composition. At its meetings, a document is being developed that establishes the European Masonic Conference and its working committee, in which the leaders of all the participating lodges, including the Great East of Russia, are represented. Thus, a single coordinating body of the main Masonic lodges of the West and East of Europe is emerging, which has set itself the goal of creating a "Europe without borders". Within the framework of this movement, the "Greater Europe" commission was established, which included many prominent European Masons: the mayor of Paris J. Chirac, the chairman of the Liberal International, Count O. Lambsdorff, his deputy W. Schottley, former Prime Minister of Belgium W. Martens, former British Minister of Defense D. Patty and others. On behalf of Russia, such prominent functionaries as A. Chubais, E. Ambartsumov, G. Sidorova (adviser to Kozyreva), G. Burbulis, K. Borovoy, A. Sobchak, V. Tretyakov (editor-in-chief of Nezavisimaya Gazeta), G. Yakunin (former priest, State Duma deputy). As a result of the commission's work, on December 21, 1993, the Charter "Greater Europe" [39] was adopted, which is a typical example of Masonic creativity. A careful reading of this unique document allows you to see the real goals pursued by the Masonic behind-the-scenes in relation to Russia behind the usual Masonic discourses about freedom, democracy and peace.

First of all, the goal is to deprive it of its national identity by drawing it into the sphere of "adherence to the European principles of freedom and democracy," the main of which is proclaimed the principle of individualism, which is absolutely alien to Russia. "There is a common thing," say the Masonic sages, "that gives this diversity the features that are characteristic of Europe: the desire for individualism and pluralism, the struggle for these values, which, under favorable circumstances, led to success." The Western principles offered to the Russian people as a model are in fact an expression of spiritual degradation and, in terms of their inner content, are immeasurably qualitatively lower than the spiritual values ​​of Orthodoxy and conciliar collectivity, professed by our people for a millennium. Moreover, they contradict them and therefore cannot be accepted under any circumstances.

Of course, Masonic ideologists are well aware of this and include in the charter the idea of ​​the need to fight all dissidents - "aggressive nationalism" (meaning here all those who disagree with the idea of ​​a "Greater Europe") and religious fundamentalism (including both Islam and Orthodoxy, those who disagree put up with the hydra of pluralism).

It is planned to develop a kind of a great charter as a constitution for "Greater Europe", which should provide for the creation of supranational superstructures, a kind of pan-European government that monitors the observance of laws and controls power, which for Russia will mean a complete loss of independence.

The "Greater Europe" charter is planning the same loss of independence in the economic sphere. As a starting point for the implementation of the idea of ​​a Greater European Market, it is proposed, firstly, “to create a common energy community for Greater Europe.” As is known, Western Europe has very few energy resources, which means that we are talking about the Secondly, the charter calls for the fastest liberalization of trade.

on the one hand, it will pump everything that is valuable in our country to the West, and on the other hand, it will overwhelm it with the dumping of second-rate, low-quality and even unhealthy products that cannot be marketed in the West. Thirdly, the charter requires the provision of state guarantees for the management of Western capital in Russia.

And finally, the role that the world behind the scenes assigns to Russia in geopolitics is extremely unenviable, proposing to make it a kind of bastion against Asia, opposing the entire Asian world. For this, a military pact on joint security is concluded (including, in addition to Western Europe, the United States and Canada). Moreover, it is assumed that "the protection of common European (read, Western. - O. NS.) security interests, including not only a military threat, but also a whole set of challenges of a civilizational nature. "Given the geographical position of Russia, this means that the West is not only seeking to turn Russia into an instrument of military deterrence in Asia, but also to drag our country into the fight against others, by the way, civilizations that are closer to us in spirituality. To implement the project of "Greater Europe", the world behind the scenes will need to make tectonic changes in the consciousness of the Russian people. Therefore, at its core, her project is utopian. But does this mean that she will abandon it, believing just that "big money makes history"?

Freemasons and the CIA

The Masonic conspiracy has become the prototype of the activities of many modern Western intelligence services, and above all the CIA and Mossad. "Enveloping the authorities" with a network of their employees and agents of influence, using blackmail, bribery, intimidation and defamation of their opponents have entered the arsenal of these related organizations, pursuing the common goals of establishing a "new" Judeo-Masonic world order. The merging of the leadership of Masonic lodges, Mondialist organizations and Western intelligence services has become the rule of the life of these communities. In the post-war period, I don’t know of a single example when the head of the Western secret service would not be a member of a number of Masonic lodges and mondialist organizations at the same time. A classic example of this is the ideological enemy of the Russian people, the founder and long-term head of the CIA A. Dulles. After becoming the head of the CIA, Dulles remained the director of the Council on Foreign Relations and an active Freemason until the end of his life. The CIA credo formulated by Dulles was defined as 10%. conventional intelligence (collecting and transmitting information) and 90 percent. subversive work [40]. It was this principle of the CIA's activity that Masonic and mondialist organizations most often used against Russia. The famous speech of A. Dulles in the Council on Foreign Relations with a monstrous program of subversive work against Russia and the corruption of its youth is quite natural within the framework of this principle. Of the 29, 1 billion dollars allocated by the American government in 1999 for the CIA, according to experts, about 9 billion dollars, that is, almost a third, is spent on subversive operations in Russia and the former republics of the USSR. Some of these funds are channeled through front organizations to support gangs in Chechnya and other regions of the Caucasus and Central Asia.

In 1997, during my trips to Latin American countries, I met a former CIA officer, Russian by origin, I will call him R. In his time, R. specialized in secret subversive operations of the American government against Russian Orthodoxy [41]. A sincerely repentant man told me a lot of interesting things about some of the methods of the CIA that he knew.

The American intelligence services in many cases consider the Freemasons to be a reliable support in their secret work. Through the "brotherly connection" the establishment of relations with the necessary persons is carried out. All other things being equal, when selecting agents, preference is given to freemasons and their family members. Masonic lodges serve not only as a personnel reservoir, but also as a kind of guarantor of the reliability of this or that employee.

In the countries of Eastern Europe, especially in Poland and the Czech Republic, R. told me, the organization of Masonic lodges served as the first stage in the creation of the CIA's agent network. Masons - employees of this organization - make lodges, look closely at their new brothers, gradually drawing them into their subversive work. The future President of the Czech Republic V. Havel (33o), for example, formed a series of Masonic lodges mainly of journalists, writers, university professors, some of whom were later recruited by American intelligence. Similar techniques, R. said, were used in the USSR. In 1987-1988, the CIA Freemasons created the Commonwealth of Russian Freemasons in Paris, uniting in their ranks about 50 free masons of a predominantly Scottish ritual. The organ of the CIA - Radio Liberty - begins to regularly transmit calls to the citizens of the USSR to join the Masonic lodges. One of the main strongholds of the CIA for recruitment, according to R., becomes the lodge "A. S. Pushkin" [42]).

It was this lodge and the association "A.S. Pushkin" that arose on its basis that initiated the creation of a number of other lodges, in particular the already mentioned lodge "Novikov" (Moscow), as well as "Sphinx" (St. Petersburg), "Geometry" ( Kharkov). Backed by solid CIA financial support, the freemasons of the Scottish Ritual extended their tentacles into the provinces. Today it is known about the existence of Scottish ritual lodges in Nizhny Novgorod, Voronezh, Kursk, Orel, Tula, Novosibirsk, Vladivostok, Kaliningrad, Rostov-on-Don and even in Novocherkassk. In 1992-1996, several lodges of the Scottish ritual were formed in the army and in the internal troops (it is reliably known about the existence of two). They consist mainly of middle and senior officers. According to some reports, a Masonic lodge has been functioning since the mid-90s, closely associated with the AS Pushkin association, consisting of officers from the Ministry of Defense and the General Staff.

Although their connections with the CIA were mainly the Freemasons of the Scottish ritual who worked under the roof of the Grand Lodge of France, the Western intelligence community attached an equally important role to the development of the lodges of the Grand Orient of France. No wonder the organizer of the lodges of this order in Russia was the "friend of America" ​​A. Combe, known for his connections with American intelligence. Together with his colleague J. Orefis, he trained several dozen Freemasons to work in the depths of Russia. The Grigory Vyrubov Lodge in Paris has become a kind of training center for personnel training for Russia. The leadership of this lodge regularly advertises in newspapers and on the radio about their readiness to accept new candidates for Masons. Following the lodges "North Star" (Moscow, 1991) and "Free Russia" (Moscow, 1992), the Great East of France undertakes to recreate the lodges of this order in St. Petersburg, Nizhny Novgorod and a number of other cities. The work is carried out in secret, the new brothers are obliged to keep the Masonic secret not only from others, but even from family members.

In June 1996, the Aurora lodge was registered in Moscow, designed specifically for foreigners living in Russia. Its representative V. Novikov said that the lodge would strive to influence the social life of Russia in the Masonic spirit. Modern Russian Masons, V. Novikov said, "are mainly intellectuals: teachers, journalists, officers" [43].

According to the former CIA officer R., the Rotary clubs also play a function similar to Freemasonry. Uniting in its ranks specialists, managers of enterprises, government and public institutions, Rotary is an ideal place for collecting intelligence information, as it operates among the people who own it. R. has numerous examples when, through the Rotary clubs operating in 156 countries of the world and uniting 1.2 million people, American intelligence received the information it needed. Most often this is carried out in the framework of the so-called service to the world community. Rotarians understand this "ministry" as "international activities that provide an opportunity for clubs to cooperate with one or several foreign clubs and exchange information, experience, equipment, specialists, funds for the implementation of significant joint projects" [44].

In 1996, there were about 30 Rotary clubs in Russia [45]. During the 90s, in addition to the clubs I have already mentioned in Moscow and St. Petersburg, Rotary organizations emerged in Irkutsk, Kiev, Dubna, Yakutsk, Magadan [46], Khabarovsk, Vladivostok, Novosibirsk, Krasnoyarsk, Barnaul, Kemerovo, Yekaterinburg, Angarsk. The Rotary movement is run from the United States. Its headquarters are located in Evanston, Illinois. Indispensable members of Rotary are American presidents (starting with Taft) and the leaders of the CIA (starting with A. Dulles).

The establishment of official relations between the Yeltsin regime and the Order of Malta and the entry into it personally of Yeltsin and many figures from his entourage, in particular S. Filatov, B. Berezovsky, V. Yumashev, V. Kostikov, R. Abramovich and others, opened the doors to its numerous emissaries. A branch of Maltese Catholics appears in St. Petersburg. It was founded by V. Feklist, "authorized by the World Parliament of the Knightly Order of Malta" [47].

In addition to the Catholic Order of Malta, the "Orthodox Order of Malta", founded by Archbishop Makarios, operates in St. Petersburg. The order is run from London and is financially supported by wealthy Greek Masons in the United States. According to the press, its St. Petersburg branch includes intellectuals from the Pushkin House and the University; the residence is located in the Old Village. At one time, the "Orthodox Maltese" even claimed the Zelenetsky monastery near Volkhov [48].

Islamic Freemasonry stands apart from other Masonic lodges and associations in modern Russia. Little is known about him. Most of the scattered information about the Young Turkey lodge was created on the basis of Masonic formations that existed in Turkey since the late 19th - early 20th centuries. Genetically, these associations are associated with the Grand Orient of France. It is also known about visits to these associations by Russian masons of the early XX century (A. Guchkov, M. Margulies, etc.). After World War II, apparently, not without the participation of the US and NATO intelligence services, the activities of these associations, and above all of "Young Turkey", are reoriented from internal problems to the implementation of the ideas of the Great Turan - the creation of a global mystical Turkish state on a Masonic basis, an attraction to Turkey, lands belonging to Russia-USSR, including the Muslim territories of the Caucasus (Azerbaijan, Chechnya, Dagestan), Central Asia and the Volga region. Before the collapse of the USSR, the main goal of the free masons of "Young Turkey" and similar organizations was to "build bridges" with the national intelligentsia of these regions with "the prospect of their further involvement in Masonic work." With large financial resources, "Young Turkey" has achieved notable success in promoting the delusional idea of ​​the Great Turan. In particular, G. Dzhemal, who later became the chairman of the Islamic Committee of Russia, became a pet of this Masonic organization. In the early 90s, the members were the leaders of the Chechen bandit formations D. Dudaev (and later also Maskhadov), the presidents of Tatarstan and Ingushetia M. Shaimiev and R. Aushev. The President of Azerbaijan G. Aliyev also maintains ties with this lodge (not being its member). The presence of such a number of high-ranking persons is explained rather not simply by the Masonic significance of this lodge, but by the political weight of those forces that initiate its activities and finance the anti-Russian projects of its members.

In Russia in the 90s, the most powerful mechanism of destabilization and destruction in the hands of the world behind the scenes was the Soros Foundation, headed by one of the leaders of the "world government", a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Club, J. Soros [49]. Under the guise of "philanthropic" activities, which I have already talked about, this influential Freemason and mondialist created an extensive subversive organization that worked closely with the CIA and Mos-Sad and became a legal roof for many of these intelligence officers [50]. The Soros Foundation coordinates its activities with other subversive, anti-Russian organizations in the West. According to another representative of the "world government," a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, US Deputy Secretary of State S. Talbott, "Soros's policy is not identical to the one pursued by the American government, but it competes with it. We are trying to synchronize our efforts in former communist countries with Germany, France, Great Britain and George Soros "[51].

Financial and economic scams of the Freemasons

J. Soros was the think tank and initiator of almost all the largest financial and economic scams committed in Russia in the first half of the 90s. It was he who, in collaboration with Sh. Aisenberg ("B'nai-Brit"), D. Ruben (the English lodge), M. Rich (the lodge of the York ritual in New York), stood behind the backs of Chubais, Gaidar, Burbulis and a number of other newly-minted Russian Masonic functionaries during the so-called privatization, as a result of which the overwhelming part of the property belonging to the Russian people passed into the hands of international financial swindlers. According to V.P. Polevanov, Chairman of the State Property Committee, "Russia's 500 largest privatized enterprises with a real value of at least $ 200 billion were sold for a pittance (about $ 7, 2 billion) and ended up in the hands of foreign companies and their front structures. "[52].

In the mid-90s, the Soros Foundation carried out a number of operations to undermine the Russian economy. According to the Wall Street Journal (1994. 10. 11.), American financial experts consider the collapse of the ruble in Russia on the so-called Black Tuesday, October 11, 1994, the result of the activities of a group of funds led by Soros. Attention is drawn to the fact that by the beginning of the summer of 1994 the Soros Foundation had acquired shares of Russian enterprises in the amount of $ 10 million. In late August - early September, Soros, having waited for the rise in the share price, sold them. According to experts, on this operation he made a profit equivalent to $ 400 million. At the end of September, the Soros Foundation began buying dollars for rubles, which, according to American experts, caused a rapid rise in the US dollar exchange rate and a rapid fall of the ruble, the collapse of the financial system and the rapid ruin of many Russian enterprises.

An even more destructive operation by Soros against the Russian economy was the manipulation of GKO securities. In 1992-1993, as a permanent adviser to the President and the Government of the Russian Federation, J. Soros initiated the idea of ​​the GKO pyramid. The payment of high (but not secured by real income) interest to the holders of GKO securities was ensured through the compulsory imposition of their purchase by Russian enterprises and financial institutions. Operations with GKOs were carried out with the decisive role of such members of the Chernomyrdin government and consultants to mondialist organizations, such as A. Chubais, G. Burbulis, A. Shokhin, B. Fedorov, A. Livshits.

As the organizations and institutions that could be imposed on GKOs were exhausted, the collapse of this financial adventure was approaching. Soros, who has invested considerable capital in GKOs, determined the moment of the onset of this collapse earlier than others. In the spring and summer of 1998, he and the businessmen and senior government officials associated with him, through dummies, are gradually getting rid of GKOs, thereby provoking their further depreciation. The main speculative source of income for the Russian government is crumbling. According to data published by Western investigators and experts, more than 700 of the largest Russian figures, including state leaders, participated in the GKO scam. On the day of the default on August 17, many top government officials sold their GKOs at super-profitable rates for the money of the International Monetary Fund, thus depositing billions of dollars into their personal accounts in the West, leaving worthless notes of GKOs in the state treasury. On August 17, the government refuses to pay T-bills. For banks and enterprises that have concentrated in their hands a significant amount of GKOs, a real financial catastrophe sets in, which caused the devaluation of the ruble by three times, a rapid rise in prices and the ruin of enterprises.

FAVORITES OF THE WORLD STAGE

Since both foreign investors and banks bought GKO bonds because of their high yield, they also suffered. The already low financial prestige of Russia fell to zero. According to the Institute of Economic Analysis, thanks to the GKO-OFZ market, the federal budget managed to attract about $ 18.6 billion in five years. USA. At the end of May 1998, the accumulated debt reached 71.9 billion dollars. Thus, for every dollar attracted to the state budget, Russia had to pay four dollars [53]. Most of the payment funds were embezzled by members of the criminal Masonic clan and his entourage. Using official information, members of Masonic organizations amassed huge fortunes on this scam. So, A. Chubais only in 1996 earned 2 billion rubles on T-bills. [54]. G. Burbulis did not lag behind him - the Bank "Strategy", headed by him, literally grew on government securities. The head of the State Tax Service, Pochinok, despite his official position, did not even hide the fact that his huge profits were obtained as a result of speculation on the government securities market [55].

The business of Burbulis is closely connected with the business of other financial swindlers - the freemason A. Smolensky and the Urinson brothers [56]. The latter have close ties with the Bank of New York, through which the illegal Rosvooruzheniye transactions are believed to be carried out. In this business, Burbulis cooperates with "one of the largest criminals in the world," wanted by Interpol, a major drug dealer, a Mossad agent, already mentioned by me. above M. Rich [57]; as well as the Russian criminal businessman A. Tarasov. Burbulis received oil export licenses from Yeltsin for Rich, bringing in huge profits.

Chubais's business is directly related to the machinations of J. Soros, whose interests are represented by B. Jordan, who actually manages the ONEKSIMBANK-MFK group, behind which is the Anglo-American Jewish capital. Chubais had a joint business with Bond-Nielsen, a large Freemason, owner of a shipbuilding company, who was convicted of fraud and prosecuted [58]. It is known about the cooperation of Chubais (with his personal assistance, Yeltsin signed documents supporting the criminal business) with the Far Eastern mafia structures involved in the smuggling of valuable seafood into Japan [59]. Chubais's financial frauds with compensation to the National Sports Fund (Sh. Tarpishchev), which received almost 33 non-denominated trillion rubles from the state budget, received a wide response. rub. [60].

"Cutting off the rough stone of Russia", practically all the large Russian Masons I know have amassed huge personal fortunes from the troubles of our Motherland. In addition to the free masons already listed above, particular success in this field, according to the periodicals, was achieved by: Commander of the Order of Malta B. Berezovsky (personal fortune more than $ 1 billion), member of B'nai-Brit and the Rotary club V. Gusinsky (at least $ 800 million), consultants of the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations V. Chernomyrdin and R. Vyakhirev (approximately $ 1 billion each), a member of the Rotary Club Y. Luzhkov (300-400 million .doll.).

According to data published in Swiss, Italian and American newspapers in August-September 1999, most of the loans of the International Monetary Fund - at least 15 billion dollars. - were plundered by the Commander of the Order of Malta B. Yeltsin, his daughter and their closest circle (A. Chubais, A. Livshits, O. Soskovets, V. Potanin) [61].

This money was pumped through offshore zones created by the famous figure of the Masonic movement, the former head of the IMF from Russia K. Kagalovsky in Cyprus, Gibraltar and Zurich. Among the main transshipment points in the implementation of this international scam was one of the largest American banks - the Bank of New York, whose four main leaders - T. Reni, D. Beckot, R. Gomery and M. Moose - were on the Council on Foreign Relations. Thus, the operation was carried out without the knowledge of the world behind the scenes. Operational management of the transfer of funds abroad was carried out by Kagalovsky's wife, who works as one of the executive directors at the Bank of New York. Much of the stolen money was placed in the securities of American corporations. Apparently, Kagalovsky's close associate and friend, Chairman of the United Management Board of Yukos and the head of Bank Menatep, M. Khodorkovsky, took part in the scam. In 1993, at a meeting of the world behind the scenes, the World Economic Forum in Davos, M. Khodorkovsky was included in the list of 200 representatives of humanity, whose activities will influence the development of the world in the third millennium. Steeped in financial scams and outright theft, international and Russian Masonic leaders are confident in the superiority of the Judeo-Masonic civilization. The union of all believers in mammon is for them a guarantee of the universal victory of the "new world order". In their worship of money, the forces of world Freemasonry and Mondialism are blind and utopian, but this is what makes them capable of any crime and villainy. Pet is nothing more dangerous for humanity than a utopia with power behind the scenes and big money and always striving for more and more complete and absolute power. The most striking example of this is the current events in Russia.

New favorites behind the scenes

The world behind the scenes is especially persistent in working with the current ruling regime in Russia, trying to protect itself from the "accidental change of power" and "to ensure the continuity of the leaders of democratic reforms," ​​that is, politicians pleasing to the West. The series of politicians like Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Gaidar, Chernomyrdin, Chubais, Nemtsov, Kiriyenko, who went bankrupt and completely discredited themselves in Russia, are being replaced by a new echelon of favorites of the world behind the scenes. Among them, in addition to the already mentioned G. Yavlinsky, a special place in the late 1980s is occupied by L. Lebed, in whose image the elite of the world behind the scenes sees a modified analogue of Yeltsin. The general who is not very literate, limited, unprincipled and unscrupulous in his means appeals to the West with his readiness to make any concessions and agreements in exchange for political support.

In 1995, during my trip to the United States from sources close to the government circles of this country, I received information that among influential American politicians there is an opinion that it is necessary to elect Lebed, not Yeltsin, as the new president of Russia. Even the amount was called Money that this group of politicians was going to "invest" in Lebed - about 1 billion dollars. Then I did not believe this information - the personality of the Swan seemed too insignificant and frivolous to me. However, further events showed that I was wrong.

In October 1996, A. Lebed arrived in New York at the invitation to take part in a meeting of one of the main bodies of the world behind the scenes - the Council on Foreign Relations. The meeting was preceded by a friendly meeting between Lebed and the "architects of the destruction of the USSR", the leaders of the said Council - former US President George W. Bush, former US Secretary of State D. Baker and General B. Scowcroft. These well-known Russophobes familiarized Lebed with the agenda and outlined the main areas of discussion at the upcoming meeting.

On November 18, Lebed was admitted to the Council on Foreign Relations. The meeting with him lasted about 5 hours. G. Kissinger introduced the general to those present, D. Rockefeller, Z. Brzezinski, former American ambassador to Moscow, personnel intelligence officer D. Matlock, D. Simes took an active part in the discussion. The leaders of the world behind the scenes assessed the personality of the general as a contender for the presidency of Russia. In his speech at the Council, Lebed assured the "world government" that he considers it necessary to continue the reforms initiated by Yeltsin, approves the West-centric foreign policy of the current government and "cooperation with NATO without hysteria", advocates the final destruction of "imperial and anti-Semitic traditions" of Russia. When asked whether he was ready to specifically fight anti-Semitism in Russia, the general replied "sharply in the affirmative." Answering questions about the Caucasian territory of Russia, the general said that he was ready to agree to its withdrawal from the North Caucasus and the transfer of the entire Caucasian region under the control of the West. Lebed also agreed with the possibility of NATO custody of Russia's nuclear facilities.

The next day, General Lebed attended a meeting of the World Jewish Organization, at which he once again assured Jewish leaders of his readiness to fight the "imperial and anti-Semitic traditions" of Russia and urged participants to support him as a candidate for the presidency of Russia. At all meetings and meetings of Lebed with the American elite, the issue of financial assistance to the future presidential contender in Russia was discussed. According to an Orthodox newspaper, in 1999 Lebed visited the largest French Masonic lodge, the Great East. With his participation, an ancient ritual was carried out, after which he was awarded the honorary Masonic signs [62].

A. Lebed is not the only political figure used by the world behind the scenes to influence the Russian patriotic movement. According to information I received from the aforementioned former CIA officer, in the second half of the 80s - early 90s, this subversive organization allocated hundreds of millions of dollars to conduct special operations in the Russian patriotic movement, including the recruitment of agents and the introduction of their people in patriotic organizations, and above all, surrounded by prominent patriotic figures. According to my informant, by deception, bribery, blackmail, the CIA managed to persuade a handful of traitors to cooperate, playing a certain role in patriotic organizations, as well as in some magazines and newspapers of patriotic orientation in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kiev, Minsk, Nizhny Novgorod and Novosibirsk. As my informant, who attended various meetings and colloquia of the CIA, managed to understand, a significant part of these renegades [63] were selected from former emigrants of the third wave associated with organizations such as NTS, Radio Liberty, and without that previously collaborating with the CIA. The so-called Orthodox Masons, who continue their activities in the United States in the Orthodox Church of American jurisdiction, provided noticeable assistance in their introduction into Russian patriotic organizations. Moreover, the CIA did not always recruit directly [64]. Most often, this was done through CIA-funded public organizations and foundations.

The main goals of the CIA in relation to the Russian patriotic movement were:

introducing instability, contradictions, playing off leaders;

spreading defamatory rumors about authoritative Russian patriots;

• the implementation of actions that contributed to the split and fragmentation of patriotic organizations, discrediting the leaders of the movement who have the ability to unite significant patriotic forces around themselves;

the creation of organizations that are false in their tasks, designed to split the patriotic movement, bring confusion into it, and replace its true goals.

In this regard, it is appropriate to cite as an example the events that developed in the Moscow Society for the Protection of Monuments (VOOPIiK) in the second half of the 1980s. During this period, the Moscow society was one of the spiritual centers of the Russian national revival, concentrating around itself significant forces of Russian patriots. Around 1984, a well-organized anti-patriotic group emerged here, promoting liberal-Masonic ideology. This group set as its goal during the next re-election of the board of the Moscow society to displace its leadership and change the patriotic direction of its activities. The group failed to achieve this goal. All of its members were almost unanimously expelled from society and began to write denunciations against patriots, accusing them of anti-Semitism, extremism, ignorance and even Orthodox clericalism. The finale of this story is most interesting: a few years later, the most active members of the anti-Russian, anti-Orthodox group, unfortunately, became private guests of patriotic radio stations such as Radonezh and People's Radio, and one even got a job teaching at the Moscow Theological Academy. The names of these werewolves will be announced in due course.

Much of what was planned in the CIA in relation to "national-patriots", he did not succeed, although some of its operations in the Russian patriotic movement were considered by the CIA to be successful. For example, the 1991-1992 special operations to introduce their agents into the entourage of authoritative leaders of the patriotic movement, who most often acted under the roof of entrepreneurs and financiers, who offered these leaders money and gave them advice, as a result of which the patriotic movement came to a standstill.

While conducting active subversive activities against the Russian national movement, seeking to crush and destroy it, the United States, at the same time, seeks to strengthen anti-Russian national movements in all possible ways in the former republics of the USSR and in the national regions of Russia itself. For these purposes, the CIA spends at least $ 1 billion. in year. Particular attention is paid to the development of the anti-Russian movement in Little Russia. The budget of the Ukrainian nationalist organizations RUKH, UNA-UNSO is funded by the CIA for almost three quarters, and most of the top of these organizations have been in the service of the American government since the "pre-perestroika" times. Z. Brzezinski's frank words are quite characteristic at a closed meeting of the American-Ukrainian advisory committee on the occasion of his being awarded the title of Honorary Citizen of Lvov: “The building of our American-Ukrainian advisory committee is the long-term planning of US-Ukraine relations. My role as the leader of this committee is reduced to It is important that Ukraine constantly and consistently moves to the West, because if it neglects this and does not define itself as a Central European state, it will be drawn into the sphere of influence of Russia.

A "new world order" under US hegemony is being created against Russia, at the expense of Russia and on the ruins of Russia.

Ukraine for us is an outpost of the West against the restoration of the Soviet Union "[65].

Target - destruction of Russia

In the second half of the 90s, the Judeo-Masonic leaders of the mondialist organizations - the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Club, the World Forum and other criminal communities, hatching the idea of ​​world domination over humanity, began to loudly declare about the approaching date for the establishment of a "new world order ". Using the "magic number" of 2000, the mondialists believe that by this time the "world government" will not only control, but also direct all spheres of society's life, including the religious one. For example, one of the ideologists of Mondialism J. Attali in his program book "Horizon Lines" announced that the creation of "planetary political power" and "a new world order" would become a reality by 2000 [66]. In the plans of the world behind the scenes, Russia is assigned the role of a "reservoir of raw materials and energy resources." The future "world government" is not at all worried about the fate of the people living in our country. In the calculations of the leaders of the Judeo-Masonic world, it is regarded as a "strategic territory" (Z. Brzezinski) or "a place where the lion's share of the planet's useful resources is concentrated" (D. Rockefeller). According to Z. Brzezinski, expressed by him at a meeting of the US National Security Council, "the smaller the population in this territory, the more successful its development by the West will be."

In 1992, the study "American forecasts of the development of the geostrategic situation in the world at the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries" was published, which set out considerations in favor of dividing Russia into 6 independent state formations: Western Russia, the Urals, Western Siberia, Eastern Siberia, the Far East and the Northern Territories.

In October 1997, Z. Brzezinski proposed to divide Russia into three parts: European Russia, the Siberian Republic and the Far Eastern Republic. “Decentralized Russia,” Brzezinski declared, “is a real and desirable opportunity” [67].

At the meeting of the Bilderberg Club on May 14-17, 1998 in Great Britain, the main attention was paid to the issues of the dismemberment of Russia. For this purpose, it was proposed to divide our country into several zones of control. According to the considered scheme, the Center and Siberia should go to the United States, the Northwest - to Germany, the South and the Volga region - to Turkey, the Far East - to Japan.

According to information sparingly coming from sources close to the US government, the main strategic line of this country in relation to Russia is to maintain it in a state of constant destabilization, provoke processes of destruction and disintegration, and all kinds of assistance to destructive elements in the economy, politics and national relations.

US Secretary of State, one of the leaders of the Council on Foreign Relations M. Albright, in her speech at a meeting of the Russian-American Council of Business Cooperation (Chicago, October 2, 1998), stated that, based on the national interests of the United States, their main task is to "manage the consequences of the collapse of the Soviet empire "that it is necessary to provide" support to Russia as long as it moves in the right direction of collapse "[68].

Z. Brzezinski's book "The Grand Chessboard" and a number of his recent speeches and reports formulate a long-term geopolitical strategy of the world behind the scenes, the core of which is the US establishment. According to this strategy, in the future, it provides for the complete destruction of Russia on its historical European territory up to the Ural Mountains, the resettlement of Russians (including Little Russians and Belarusians) in remote places of Siberia as a labor force for the extraction of natural resources intended for Western industry.

If we translate the crafty expressions and formulations of Z. Brzezinski from Judeo-Masonic into normal human language, the main idea of ​​his last speeches is to destroy Russia as a country that cannot be converted into a "Western-type democracy", unable to integrate into Judeo-Masonic civilization. For Brzezinski and other ideologues of the world behind the scenes, Russia is a "black hole" hostile to the Western world. Rightly criticizing and clearly contemptuous of the criminal, corrupt Yeltsin regime, mired in theft and corruption, Brzezinski does not believe in his ability to control the development of Russia in a direction pleasing to the West, he is also skeptical about Yeltsin's possible successors, no less than he, mired in theft and corruption - Chernomyrdin, Kiriyenko, Nemtsov, Luzhkov, Primakov, Stepashin ... Like many other rulers of the world behind the scenes, Brzezinski does not like the fact that the money allocated by them through the IMF for the "reconstruction" of Russia according to the Western model is being brazenly stolen and are transferred to the accounts of Yeltsin's relatives, his prime ministers on duty and those closest to him [69]. But a raven will not gouge out a crow's eyes. Freemason Brzezinski does not propose to prosecute the Commander of the Order of Malta Yeltsin and his Masonic team, but considers their theft and corruption to be an innate characteristic of Russia. Therefore, he proposes to put an end to Russia as a geographical, political and spiritual concept once and for all, dismembering it into several puppet states subject to the West and at the same time transferring part of its territories to the states of the European Union, Turkey, Japan and even China.

One of the main tasks of the world behind the scenes is the destruction of national governments and the establishment of Judeo-Masonic ruling regimes in their place. Over the past 150 years, all Western European countries have lost their national governments and are ruled by cosmopolitan and Judeo-Masonic elites, far from the national interests of the vast majority of the French, Germans, British, Belgians and other Western European peoples. The comedy of elections of two or three essentially identical parties with a fig leaf covers the most brutal dictatorship of the secret world government and international Jewish capital, unswervingly defending the line of a handful of Jewish leaders on the world domination of the "chosen" people.

Yugoslavia and plans for the dismemberment of Russia

The plans for the barbaric armed aggression of the West against Yugoslavia were developed at meetings of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. It was these bodies that adopted political decision"punish" the Orthodox Serbian people for violating the "rules of the game" of the world behind the scenes. The main fault of the Serbs, from the point of view of the world behind the scenes, is considered their firmness in upholding the national interests of their people, the main of which is the preservation of Orthodoxy and territorial integrity. In the eyes of the leaders of the world behind the scenes, the Serbian people are the greatest heretic, since the only one among the European nations has managed to preserve the national government, which has found the strength and courage to resist the dictates of the world behind the scenes.

The armed aggression of the United States and its NATO satellites in Yugoslavia in April-June was a punitive operation of the world behind the scenes, one of the stages in the establishment of a "new world order." As a result of this operation, millions of people were injured, tens of thousands were killed during the bombings (including the use of weapons prohibited by international conventions), and most of the economy of Yugoslavia was destroyed. The world behind the scenes trampled on the accepted norms of international law and UN conventions, in fact, officially proclaiming force as the main instrument of international relations.

The deployment of NATO troops to a significant part of the territory of Yugoslavia is the actual occupation of this country, aimed at its gradual destruction with the transfer of territory to neighboring states.

One of the leaders of the "new world order" J. Soros, in his article "Breaking the Borders" [70], a month after the end of the NATO bombing campaign, said that "The Balkans cannot be reconstructed on the basis of national states." In his opinion, in order to put an end to the national statehood of the countries of South-Eastern Europe, they need to be taken under the protectorate of the European Union, which "must unfold its umbrella over the entire region." New borders are expected to be established for all Balkan countries, including Yugoslavia (excluding Kosovo), Albania, Romania and Bulgaria. In all these countries, it is planned to liquidate customs, abolish state regulation of the economy, destroy national currencies and introduce the euro or the German mark.

Similar ideas are carried out in the documents of the Council on Foreign Relations. In the program "Reconstruction of the Balkans", developed on behalf of the Council by a member of this council, President of the Carnegie Endowment M. Abramovich, Yugoslavia is absent on the map of Europe. According to this program, the "reconstruction" of the Balkans will be carried out in the conditions of "a powerful military presence of NATO at its long-term bases in Albania, Bosnia, Macedonia and Kosovo. As a result of the reconstruction, the following states will be left on the map of the Balkans: Albania, Kosovo, Romania, Serbia, Croatia and Montenegro ". The operation to redistribute borders and destroy national states in the Balkans in the Council on Foreign Relations and other organizations of the world behind the scenes is considered as a testing ground for the dismemberment of Russia and the destruction of its statehood. Secret support of anti-Russian gangs in Chechnya, Dagestan and other Caucasian territories, carried out by the American government through the regimes Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia, as well as the Afghan Taliban, organized with CIA money, aims to seize oil-rich territories from Russia, to prepare this region for the role of Russian Kosovo.

Elections-99

1999 brought a new alignment in the Judeo-Masonic elite ruling in Russia. The Russians' disrespect for this elite can only argue with their hatred of them. Under these conditions, there is a shift within the ruling elite from the criminal-cosmopolitan clan Yeltsin-Chernomyrdin-Chubais-Berezovsky to a new clan, no less criminal before the Russian people, the Luzhkov-Primakov-Gusinsky-Yavlinsky clan. This new clan is called upon to unite all anti-Russian forces inside the country, who have enriched themselves from the grief and suffering of our compatriots. Unlike the old clan, which came to power mainly on the cosmopolitan slogans of "democracy" and "freedom", the new clan is going to use the patriotic card, to play on fair hatred ordinary people to the Yeltsin regime.

At the end of 1998, a new electoral bloc was created under the false name "Fatherland - All Russia" ("OVR"), which in the fall of 1999 was headed by three well-known anti-Russian figures - Moscow Mayor Yu. Luzhkov (Rotary club), former chairman of the Russian government E Primakov (Order of Malta) and Tatar nationalist M. I. Shaimiev (Young Turkey lodge), as well as another Young Turk R. Aushev. All these people took part in one way or another in the coup d'état of September-October 1993. The main financial and informational support of the electoral bloc was carried out by one of the leaders of international Zionism, vice-president of the World Jewish Congress, head of the Jewish community of Russia, member of the B'nai Brit and Rotary club V. A. Gusinsky, who owns the newspaper Segodnya, " Moskovsky Komsomolets, Moskovskaya Pravda, Literaturnaya Gazeta, Itogi magazine, NTV television company and Ekho Moskvy radio station. Gusinsky's closest associates - M. Fridman, B. Khait, V. Malkin, A. Smolensky, M. Khodorkovsky [71] also took part in financing the OVR electoral bloc.

It is important to note that, unlike the old clan of the ruling elite, which focused mainly on the United States and the Jewish capital of this country, the new clan, headed by Luzhkov, focuses on Western Europe and Israel. The latter is evidenced by the fact that the new clan is supported by the entire leadership of the Jewish, Zionist organizations, many of which are members of the "B'nai Brit".

In the days when NATO aircraft began bombing Yugoslavia, Yu. M. Luzhkov negotiated with European representatives of the world behind the scenes in Paris. According to our Parisian informers, Luzhkov has repeatedly met with the leaders of the European network of Rotary clubs, as well as, most importantly, with the top officials of the Grand Orient of France. As a result of Luzhkov's contacts with the French brothers, they decided to support the new clan "as the most promising circle of people in modern Russia." It was decided to appeal to all brothers in different countries, and above all in Russia, with a request to help the people united around Luzhkov. The Grand East of France sent its high-ranking brother (33o) Jacques Seguela, who is considered one of the leading experts in modern electoral technologies, to help in the election campaign of Luzhkov.

The preliminary agreements of the leaders of the anti-Russian Fatherland bloc with the Masonic structures of the Great East were clarified and confirmed at the negotiations between E. Primakov and French President J. Chirac in November 1999.

In contrast to the grouping of Judeo-European Freemasonry, the American and Maltese Masonic clans are creating an electoral bloc called "Unity", which aimed to unite all anti-Russian forces under the leadership of Yeltsin and his criminal-cosmopolitan circle. The organizational structure and staffing of the block leaders were determined by B. A. Berezovsky, R. A. Abramovich, A. S. Voloshin, V. B. Yumashev. The puppet leaders who voiced the commands from B. A. Berezovsky became the nominal head of the block. All the forces of the state apparatus were sent to serve the clan interests. The first and second channels of state television, as well as TV-6, worked entirely for the propaganda of this anti-Russian bloc. To discredit their political opponents, the most dirty and shameless methods were used, which especially distinguished the telepropagandists engaged by Berezovsky - S. Dorenko, N. Svanidze, M. Leontiev. However, the protege of V. Gusinsky, E. Kiselev, was little inferior to them.

FRIENDS OF THE GREAT EAST

BOTTLES AND WAHHABITS - AGENTS OF THE GREAT TURAN

The clash between the two Masonic clans in the 99 elections showed the boundless meanness, baseness and cynicism of Masonic politics. In the heat struggle compromising, both sides stripped each other naked, showing everyone their complete poverty, boundless greed and moral insignificance. After the elections, summing up their results, two well-known Russian masons G.O. Pavlovsky and S. Govorukhin, who represented both Masonic clans, admitted that they looked at these elections as a special performance. According to Govorukhin, the election victory depended on whose behind-the-scenes direction of this performance was more successful [72].

Freemasonry - a criminal community

Freemasonry in all its manifestations is a secret criminal community pursuing the goal of achieving world domination on the basis of the Jewish doctrine of the chosen people.

The Russian Orthodox Church has always condemned Freemasonry, rightly considering it a manifestation of Satanism. Millions of Orthodox Christians annually anathematize all individuals who are members of Masonic lodges or affiliated organizations. In 1932, at the All-Diaspora Council of the Russian Orthodox Church, a decision was made that participation in Masonic lodges was "incompatible with the title of a Christian - a member of the Church of Christ, that they must either decisively renounce Freemasonry and related doctrines, or with further impenitence they will be excommunicated Holy Church ".

Freemasonry has always been the worst enemy of humanity, all the more dangerous because it tried to cover up its secret criminal activities with a veil of false discourses about self-improvement and charity. However, the terrible, sinister crimes it committed made it illegal. In almost all countries, Freemasonry was constantly prohibited by law as a criminal organization. Here are some facts:

1725 - Freemasonry is banned in France. 1737 French police forbid the gatherings of Freemasons.

1738 - Freemasonry was banned in Holland (originated in 1734) and Sweden (originated in 1735).

1740 - King Philip V of Spain issues the Decree against Freemasonry (originated in 1728).

1740 Freemasonry is prohibited on the island of Malta.

1745 - The government of the Republic of Bern prohibits Freemasonry by a special decree.

1748 the Ottoman Porta bans Freemasonry in Turkey.

1749 Lord Derwentwater, the first Grand Master of the Masonic Order in France, is executed on the scaffold for crimes.

1751 Ferdinand IV of Spain bans Freemasonry in his states.

1801 Emperor Francis II bans Freemasonry in Austria.

1823 Freemasonry is prohibited in Portugal.

Nevertheless, despite the prohibitions, Masonic ideology gradually spread in the public consciousness, poisoning its Christian content. To inspire confidence among the uninitiated in the criminal activities of the Masonic order, freemasons disguised themselves as philanthropic organizations, declared their love for humanity, piety and decency. In fact, the activities of the Freemasons reproduced the Jewish ideology of the "chosen people", allegedly having special rights to rule over the rest of humanity. With regard to all non-Masons, free masons were allowed to lie, slander, kill, play people against each other, class against class, people against people. Masonic influence was one of the main factors in all wars, revolutions and great upheavals of the XVIII-XX centuries.

By the end of the 19th century, Freemasons began to exert not an indirect, but a direct influence on the politics of Western countries. By the middle of the 20th century, Masonic lodges and associated Masonic-type organizations in these countries had become the dominant state force, playing a key role in the formation of governments and parliaments. Freemasons came to power and were able to carry out their Masonic principles without any restrictions. As a result of evil, violence and injustice, there is more in the world than before.

The stronghold of today's Western world order is the United States of America, which freemasons around the world consider a "Masonic state", a "great Masonic superpower." The US president and government are made up of high-ranking members of Masonic lodges. Today's US President B. Clinton is a world-famous "corrupted type, dishonest", a member of the elite Masonic lodge "Skull and Bones". His predecessor, George W. Bush, is a member of several lodges of Scottish and York rituals. One of the most respected American Freemasons (33o), President H. Truman stated that he "builds his state activities on the principles of Freemasonry" and wants these principles "to spread throughout the world."

Guided by his Masonic principles, President G. Truman in 1945 gave a monstrous order to atomic bomb two peaceful Japanese cities - Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as a result of which 200 thousand inhabitants died.

Based on Masonic principles, it was only after World War II that American Freemason presidents committed so many war crimes against humanity that their actions deserve a military tribunal:

1948-1953 - participation in punitive actions against the Filipino people. The death of many thousands of Filipinos.

1950-1953 - armed invasion of Korea by about a million American soldiers. The death of hundreds of thousands of Koreans.

1964-1973 - participation of 50 thousand American soldiers in punitive operations against the Republic of Laos. Thousands of victims again.

1964 - Bloody suppression of the Panamanian national forces, demanding the return of Panama's rights in the Panama Canal zone.

1965-1973 biennium - military aggression against Vietnam. The annihilation of over half a million Vietnamese. Following Hitler's example, peaceful villages were completely destroyed, whole territories were burned out with napalm, along with all the inhabitants. Mass killings of women and children.

1970 - aggression against Cambodia. From the United States - 32 thousand soldiers. Numerous civilian casualties.

1982-1983 - terrorist attack by 800 US Marines against Lebanon. Numerous victims again.

1983 - military intervention in Grenada by about 2 thousand marines. Hundreds of lives have been lost.

1986 - perfidious attack on Libya. The bombing of Tripoli and Benghazi. Numerous victims.

1989 - armed intervention in Panama. Thousands of Panamanians were killed.

1991 - a large-scale military action against Iraq, involved 450 thousand military personnel and many thousands of pieces of modern technology. At least 150 thousand civilians were killed. Bombing civilian targets to intimidate the Iraqi population.

1992-1993 - the occupation of Somalia. Armed violence against civilians, killing of civilians.

1999 - aggression against Yugoslavia, thousands of victims of the civilian population, hundreds of thousands of refugees.

But this is only open aggression. And how many decades the United States has been waging an undeclared war against El Salvador, Guatemala, Cuba, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Iran, investing huge amounts of money to maintain puppet pro-America

Kan regimes or American-inspired rebels that opposed legitimate governments that did not recognize American dominance in the region. Honduras was turned by the United States into a military base for the struggle against El Salvador and Nicaragua.

The total number of victims of the criminal orders of American Masonic presidents in 1948-1999 alone is more than a million people, not counting the wounded and disadvantaged.

Humanity has the right to present the "Masonic superpower" with an account and judge the American Masonic administration and the Masonic administrations of its satellites but NATO as war criminals at the new Nuremberg trial. Like the ideology of fascism, Masonic ideology should be outlawed, and its carriers should be subject to harsh criminal prosecution. Masonic lodges and related organizations, such as Rotary or Pen Clubs, should be rightly equated with fascist organizations and prohibited.

In Russia, Masonic lodges were banned three times by special Imperial decrees - under Catherine II, Paul I and Alexander I. The last ban lasted until February 1917.

Nevertheless, despite the ban, the Masonic lodges continued to "work" in secret. Criminal traces of their activities can be traced both in the 19th and in the 20th centuries (and even under Soviet rule). A new "flourishing" of Masonic lodges took place during the so-called perestroika. By special decrees of M. S. Gorbachev, and a little later also B. N. Yeltsin, Freemasonry was again legalized and greatly expanded the scope of its activities at the expense of Masonic clubs and other organizations created to achieve Masonic goals. In its current form, Freemasonry poses a huge threat to Russian society. Today, Russia, as at the beginning of the century, faces the task of completely eliminating and banning Masonic organizations.

Because the masons

Paul Jeffers, in his book "Franco-Freemasons - Secrets of the Most Ancient Secret Society", argues that most of the Freemasons ruling the world are currently concentrated in the United States. Jeffers estimates there are 5.9 million members of Masonic lodges, of which 4.1 million live in the States.

In the 20th century, the myth of Freemasonry as an occult secret organization that solves world problems at its own discretion, and to which sooner or later all influential people are invited, spread everywhere. It is allegedly possible to become a member of the lodge only once, after which it is impossible to leave it. Over time, the word "Freemasonry" in many countries was added to the prefix "Jew", which meant the desire of the Jews for world domination.

All of these myths have a foundation. Firstly, Masons were really always interested in religious topics, and often they did not find agreement with the church - hence the numerous legends about the occult. Secondly, despite the fact that the history and symbolism of the Freemasons have long been known, they still comply with the prohibition on non-disclosure of information, since the ability to keep secrets is considered an important moral and ethical quality. The existence of levels of initiation, membership in an organization of influential and wealthy people, its corporate character is a historical reality, as is the fact that many members of Masonic lodges were Jews.

Who became a Freemason

Supporters it is believed that of the 43 US presidents, 25 were Freemasons. Among them are George Washington, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson and Ronald Reagan.

The idea of ​​the conjugation of Freemasonry with Jewish world domination spread throughout the 20th century. The use of Jewish symbolism, the Old Testament or the Torah in their rituals is often cited as one of the main historical facts. In fact, potential members of the organization did indeed take an oath on holy book the religion to which they belong. But their religion varied - from Buddhism to Protestantism.

For most Masons, it is not belonging to a particular religion that is important, but the very principle of belief in the existence of God, a higher entity or the Great Architect of the Universe, as it is sometimes called. In one of the statutes of the Freemasons of the 18th century. it even says: anyone can be a Freemason except a "stupid atheist." Since one of the most important tenets of Masonic ideology is monotheism, and most of the regular lodges in Europe were Christian, the candidate often swore on the Bible, including the Old Testament. But some did it on the Torah, because they belonged to Judaism, were Jews.

Where did the myth that Jewish Freemasons rule the world came from?

Scholars studying the history of Freemasons are not inclined to agree with conspiracy theories. They believe that the Freemasons are too decentralized to represent a real force capable of ruling the world. They are united not by a common organization, but by a commonality of ideas and principles.

Historically, there were quite a few people of creative and intellectual professions among European Jews. This is due to the fact that the Jews had a longer tradition of reading and interpreting the sacred text than Christians, but they did not have their own state, and therefore they did not cultivate the land and did not carry military service. Instead, Jews in Europe were actively engaged in various crafts, arts, trade, usury, which - unlike Christianity - did not prohibit Judaism, and from which banking later grew.

The Jews themselves strove to participate in public organizations. The fact is that it was in the 19th century that they underwent secularization. Fewer Jews remained committed to their religion and took part in the life of the community, more and more - were baptized and became members of other communities, including Masonic lodges. Former Jews were interested in this as a social experience and self-realization. Freemasonry hoped to use their connections, since historically, as already mentioned, welcomed not only "builders", but also "outside" members - wealthy and educated people who could ensure the advancement of the creations of engineering.

The Jews, who continued to profess the old religion, had their own regular and irregular Jewish Masonic lodges, but there were no more regular ones than any others - Catholic or Protestant, and the irregulars were small in format and did not obey a single "center", therefore it is unlikely could rule the world. However, in the XX century, the myth of the "Jewish-Masonic conspiracy" began to spread actively. He was especially fueled by Nazi and Muslim propaganda. But it all began in the Russian Empire, in the city of St. Petersburg, where at the beginning of the 20th century the scandalous "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" were published.

20th century Masonic conspiracy myths

In the United States alone, there are more than 51 Masonic lodges that are fairly independent from each other. At the international level, some Masonic lodges not only do not depend on each other, but do not even want to recognize each other's legitimacy.

In 1943, a French director and apologist for the pro-Nazi Vichy regime made the film Secret Forces about a Masonic conspiracy of Jews who hope to overthrow the world order. During the same war years, a number of Holocaust victims, among whom were former Freemasons, were able to organize small lodges right on the territory of concentration camps. In those conditions, the ethical nature of the organization's activities manifested itself, whose members strove to preserve "secret knowledge", religious, spiritual, idealistic principles even in the face of death. Of course, there was no talk of ruling the world from a concentration camp.

After the war, the myth of the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy becomes relevant in Islam. In the late forties, the inhabitants of the Middle East were faced with the return of Jews to the "Holy Land" - that is, for themselves, with the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Muslims from Palestine. In 1972, Freemasonry was officially banned by the President of Pakistan. In Iraq, under Saddam Hussein, it was recommended to execute those who preach Zionist principles or promote the development of Masonic lodges. In 1988, the Hamas Charter included a separate clause describing the Zionist Freemason conspiracy. However, not a single documentary confirmation of the connection between Freemasonry and the change in the world order has been found. And the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" are considered by most historians to be falsification.

Ksenia Zharchinskaya

Is Freemasonry a Gathering of Old Men? Isn't Freemasonry extinct yet?

There are many people of all ages among Masons, starting from the age of 21 (or 18 years old depending on the jurisdiction). Masons are millions of people in the world and hundreds in Russia. The spiritual and moral light of Freemasonry has not extinguished and attracts people who are looking for their place in the world, looking for the place of Man before God. In addition, it can be added that almost half of the brothers ordained as Freemasons in Russia in 1999 are under 30 years old.

Freemasons are racists or elitists?

Freemasonry declares the equality of people regardless of their skin color, religion, nation, social origin and social status. Freemasonry not only declares, but also professes this principle. Among the brothers there are people of all races and nations. A person's access to the Lodge can never be limited by national or racial criteria. In many ways, the principle of human equality has spread throughout the world thanks to the Freemasons Order.

Elitism is a rather difficult term to define. If you mean the question of whether Freemasonry makes strict demands on its members, then the answer is yes. These requirements are known to all and are clearly declared by the order: faith in God and the fulfillment of his Testaments, high spiritual and moral development, constant concern for neighbors, adamant loyalty to the ideals of the family and the state. Do most people meet these requirements? If you think not, then Freemasonry is elitist.

Rumors that Freemasonry is open only to the "upper classes", to businessmen and high-ranking politicians are incorrect. The source of these rumors is false ideas about the goals of Freemasonry, unfounded suspicions that the order is striving for world domination.

Is the lodge a place for businessmen to conduct common affairs?

No. Moreover, most Freemasons believe that a business preference given to someone because they are a Freemason is a non-Masonic act. A person who tries to become a Freemason because he hopes to get economic or political benefits from it will never become a Freemason.

If you are interested in organizations or partnerships created for joint business, we recommend joining the Rotary Club.

In Freemasonry, the titles "Venerable Master" and others are used. Is Freemasonry a sect or some kind of religious organization?

No. The titles used in Freemasonry are simply full of beauty, grandeur, ancient symbolism. And they persist for these reasons, but do not carry the meaning of worshiping their owners, or recognizing them as secular authority over other members of the Brotherhood. The fact that a brother is an Honored Master or someone else speaks only of his role in the rites of Freemasonry and can in the administration of the Order. The attainment of a degree by a person gives him authority, because Freemasonry is very scrupulous and strict in establishing the correspondence of a brother's merits and their official recognition.

Freemasonry contains many mechanisms to prevent rebirth into a sect. One of the important principles of Freemasonry is the constant rotation of leading officials. Thus, the head of the lodge, the Venerable Master, cannot hold this position for more than 3 years in a row.

Is Freemasonry a Secret Organization? What is a Masonic secret, and what can you talk about publicly?

Freemasonry does not hide the fact of its existence. Some lodges also do not hide the fact of their existence. For example, on the Russian Web you can find the names of almost all Russian lodges operating under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge of Russia. Over time, many of them will be presented separately on our website.

At the same time, the brothers consider it inappropriate to discuss deeply personal issues related to the sphere of spiritual development in public. This position is at least worthy of understanding. According to our traditions, each brother has the right to declare his membership in the Order without any approval. However, he is not entitled to name the other members of the Order without obtaining their direct consent.

So far, in Russia, Masons cannot speak so broadly and openly about their affiliation with the organization as in the United States or in Europe. This is a consequence of the negative attitude towards the Order of a small but extremely aggressive part of our fellow citizens. We also remember that we have a long history of persecution by the authorities.
In addition to the lists of members of the order, the secret is represented by Masonic rituals, secret words, identification marks.

Why are Masonic rituals secret?

The initiation process has an esoteric side. The brother gets acquainted with the ritual of each degree only at the moment of initiation into this degree. Thus, the maximum effect is achieved from initiation. This provides material for deep reflection, creates inner spiritual tension.

Is Freemasonry a Religion?

No. Freemasonry requires its members to believe in God. But Freemasonry does not force a person to adhere to a certain faith, does not impose on him any system of his own for the performance of religious rituals, and does not even require a certain confessional affiliation.

All the rituals of Freemasonry and its symbolism are means of spiritual improvement of a person, but we avoid judgments about God. Such judgments for a brother are determined by confessional affiliation (if any) or inner spiritual feeling. The order only contributes to the disclosure of a person's inner religiosity, strengthens his faith, making it deeper and more sincere. But Freemasonry does not add any color to personal religious beliefs.

But you consider the Great Architect of the Universe to be your God?

Quite the opposite is true. We call God the Great Architect of the Universe, since He created everything that exists. You have probably heard how He was called the Creator. Agree, there is a difference: consider God the Builder or the builder - God!

Freemasons control the world?

No. Authors putting forward such thesis need the immediate help of a psychiatrist. We recommend that you read "Foucault's Pendulum" by Umberto Eco. This book, in particular, shows how people come to such mental deviations. This thesis is completely frivolous. Therefore, it is not specifically considered here. It also does not consider the theses of authors like S.A. Nilus, Leo Taxil, O. Platonov that the Masons allegedly worship Satan, that he is present in the form of a goat at every meeting of the lodge and constantly beats the table with a hammer, etc. The reputation of such people is the best refutation of everything that they have written. The work of these people is full of deliberate falsifications. The "lists of Russian masons" published in these works are an absolute lie. The Masonic rituals published there are nine-tenths false.

Are Masonic rituals demeaning for a candidate?

No. There is nothing further from the truth. The purpose of the rituals is to teach a person the virtues of Freemasonry and this cannot be achieved by means of humiliation. Our rituals are very beautiful and full of symbolism. Their origin was overshadowed by the glory of the great mysteries of various religions of many peoples of the Earth throughout its history, with the only amendment that modern Masonic rites in no way threaten life, physical and mental health, honor and dignity of the candidate and his relatives.

Have Masonic rituals been simplified lately?

The United Grand Lodge of Russia uses rituals that basically have not changed much for the last hundred years. A number of jurisdictions, primarily in the United States, use simplified rituals. To a greater extent, this applies to degrees of Scottish Rite.

Freemasons call the buildings that belong to them Temples. Are the rites of religious worship performed there?

No. According to the definition of many dictionaries, the Temple is a building that serves for the special purposes of an organization. For example, for holding meetings of the Lodge. In addition, according to the ritual, the Lodge symbolically sits at the construction site of the Jerusalem Temple, that is, before its consecration, therefore, strictly speaking, it is not yet a religious building.

Does the Masons control the tripartite commission or does it control them? Is Freemasonry related to the Bilderberg Conference?

Trilateral Commission. It was created in 1973. Three leading industrial formations in the world - the European Union, North America (USA and Canada), Japan - form it. The members of the commission are 330 citizens of these countries who have distinguished themselves in business, science, politics (but not in government organizations), in the media.

The entire commission meets once a year. During the meeting, issues of vital importance for the regions covered by the commission are considered.

Neither the organizers of the commission, nor its current administrative composition were and are not Masons.

The Bilderberg Conference was founded by Prince Bernard in 1954 in Osterbek, the Netherlands. An annual three-day conference, which is attended by about 100 bankers, economists, politicians, government officials. The participants are elected by a committee of the commission in The Hague.

The following document can give an idea of ​​the work of the commission: A public statement by the Bilderberg Conference. This commission also has nothing to do with Freemasonry.

We all naively think that different countries the world is ruled by legally elected presidents and parliaments, that in the so-called developed democracies the people have the right to a decisive vote in making certain fateful decisions. In reality, the world is actually ruled by a narrow group of people who are often not endowed with high positions and powers. They usually tend to stay in the background, their names are not known to the general public. But it is these people who manipulate kings and presidents, and decide at their own discretion the fate of entire nations.

Russia has always been in the crosshairs of their truly aggressive interests ...

Order of Satan

Historians call such people Masons or the "Order of Freemasons", who set themselves the goal of building a spiritual temple of Freedom, Equality and Brotherhood, so that a universal paradise without national and religious borders would come on Earth. At first glance, the goal seems to be noble. But the following circumstances confuse her.

The structure is secret. When joining the order, a person must take an oath to keep the very fact of his stay in the organization secret. And the Freemasons spread their ideas not by open propaganda, but by the method of introducing the necessary and loyal people into various strata of society. This already suggests the activity of the Freemasons as a conspiratorial and even criminal structure. Suspicions only increase when you learn that there are various degrees of initiation in Masonic structures - only 33 of them are known to specialists, but in reality there are at least 99 of them (each lower lodge has no idea of ​​either the goals or the members of the higher structures). Therefore, the final, and not the declared goal of Freemasonry is still unknown.

However, the Christian Church, which has been dealing with Masonic secrets for more than one century, has its own well-founded opinion on this matter. The priests found out, for example, that the Freemasons, despite their ostentatious atheism, in reality worship some great architect of the universe. The personality of this Masonic "god" is manifested in the main symbolism of the order: a circle, inside which there are two mutually intersecting triangles in the form of an inverted five-pointed star, or pentagram. This is nothing more than a symbol of the devil. Therefore, the Church believes that Freemasonry, by all its activities, such as the construction of a "paradise" on earth (which in itself is considered the greatest heresy in many world religions), prepares the coming of the Antichrist and brings the end of the world closer ...

The first Masonic lodges appeared in Western Europe during the Middle Ages. Even some knightly orders fell under their influence, like the order of the Knights Templar, which supposedly were supposed to carry Christian ideals into the world. Gradually, the Freemasons actually captured the entire ruling European elite into their networks. It was the "free masons" who were behind such grandiose events as the English or the Great French Revolution. The culmination of their success was the 20th century ...

In 1914, the Black Hand Masonic organization organized the assassination of the Austrian Archduke Ferdinand in Sarajevo, which triggered the outbreak of the First World War. As a result of this war, three great empires disappeared from the world map - Russian, German and Austro-Hungarian. Curiously, these were precisely the countries where Freemasonry was under a de facto ban and where "free masons" could not influence political processes.

The Second World War finally consolidated the dominant position of the Freemasons throughout the world.

For the benefit of the "golden billion"

The fact is that the most real winner in the Second World War was the United States of America, which was founded in the 18th century by the prominent Freemason George Washington. It is not surprising that all the symbols of the United States are literally imbued with the Masonic spirit. Take at least one American dollar - on its front side you will see a Masonic truncated pyramid (the very temple of the "universal paradise"), illuminated by the eye of the great architect of the universe.

Somewhere from the middle of the last century, America has become a kind of headquarters for the Satanic order, and the country's powerful economic capabilities are a very convenient tool for achieving world domination in the form of a global New World Order. A renowned American expert on various secret structures that influence the economy and politics, Anthony Sutton named three influential organizations that rule America today - the Bilderberg Club, the Council of International Relations and the Trilateral Commission (TC). It is the latter that has the strongest influence.

The Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 by the owner of Chase-Manhattan Bank, David Rockefeller and Harvard University professor Zbigniew Brzezinski. This organization was conceived as an alliance of "the best minds in the world" - promising politicians, businessmen, journalists, scientists - from three parts of the world: the USA, Western Europe and Japan. These people, as conceived by the founders, should discuss among themselves various global problems and decide the fate of mankind. As Sutton notes, despite the fact that the TC has existed for 30 years, society still does not really know either about its members, or about its congresses tightly closed from the attention of the press, or about the decisions of these congresses. Nevertheless, since President Jimmy Carter, who came to power in 1976, all subsequent leaders of America, despite their different party affiliations, have been the Commissioners' protégés, including the current Barack Obama.

Here is what the Russian researcher Pavel Buzilovich writes about the goals of the TC:

“All members of the Commission are convinced internationalists, people without clan and tribe, people who are convinced that economic power is above all in life. They never tire of mentioning that the time of nation states has passed, that in the very near future the whole world will merge into one whole, with a single government sitting in Washington, which will establish its own laws throughout the world. "

The ideologists of the TC have identified the so-called "golden billion", that is, the number of residents of the United States, Western Europe and Japan, who will receive a "earthly paradise" in the form of a high standard of living. And the rest of humanity is assigned the miserable role of serving this elite. Russia is no exception here. The Commission's documents contemptuously speak of our country as an eternal state of slaves and despots, from which nothing good should be expected. Therefore, Russia, as the founder of the TC Brzezinski writes, should first be disarmed by placing our nuclear weapons under "international control", and then dismembered into several parts: the Caucasus, the Central part, Siberia and the Far East. They also defined us "economic specialization": as from a third-rate power, only cheap labor and cheap natural raw materials are expected from us on the world market.

And nothing more!

Was Lenin a member of the Masonic lodge?

Freemasons began to penetrate into our country since the time of Peter the Great, when the reformer tsar "opened a window to Europe." From time to time, when the Freemasons managed to penetrate the ranks of the aristocracy of the Russian Empire, they began to challenge the tsarist power. And then retaliatory repression followed. Thus, the Freemasons were persecuted under Catherine II and Paul I. And after the death of Alexander the First, they even staged an armed putsch, which went down in history as the Decembrist uprising.

Their more successful venture was the February Revolution of 1917. Few people know, but the Provisional Government, including both prime ministers - Prince Lvov and lawyer Alexander Kerensky - consisted entirely of Freemasons. The Freemasons were also very close to the Bolsheviks who carried out the October Revolution ...

They say that the leader of the Bolsheviks, Vladimir Lenin, as early as 1908, joined the French lodge "Art and Labor". Masons were also such prominent Bolsheviks as party functionaries Grigory Zinoviev and Christian Rakovsky, chairman of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee Yakov Sverdlov, red diplomats Maxim Litvinov and Leonid Krasin, member of the Cheka Collegium Gleb Bokiy, Lenin's favorite Nikolai Bukharin, creator of the Red Army Lev Trotsky. In 1925, Boris Astromov, the general secretary of the Russian Freemasonry organization, wrote the following flattering message to the Red leaders:

“First of all, the five-pointed star adopted by the Red Army brings us closer to you. This star is highly revered in Freemasonry as a symbol of the harmonious development of the human personality ... Then communism inscribed on its banner: universal self-determination and brotherhood of oppressed peoples. Russian Masons also call for such a brotherhood, calling themselves citizens of the world. "

However, in the late 1920s, the Bolshevik-Masonic idyll ended. The new leader of the country, Joseph Stalin, banned the activities of Masonic lodges. First of all, because the dictator could not tolerate any competitors in the matter of power, even if explicit or secret. And Stalin was very suspicious of the international connections of the Freemasons. In general, he rightly believed that members of Masonic lodges most of all work not for the interests of the state, but for their foreign centers - and for a country that was in a practically hostile external environment, this state of affairs was absolutely intolerable.

Repression followed after the ban. In the 30s, almost all communist Masons were liquidated.

Their name is legion

Another penetration of "free masons" began in the 70s. Then in the KGB of the USSR, information appeared that some Western structures were recruiting so-called agents of influence into their ranks in order to conduct subversive work against Soviet domestic and foreign policy. Mainly recruited were employees of the Central Committee of the CPSU of the "middle level" - assistants, secretaries and other figures who had access to the widest possible information and exerted a great influence on their party bosses. So, according to some sources, the Masonic structures were assigned to the assistants of the General Secretary of the Central Committee Leonid Brezhnev - journalists Alexander Bovin, Fyodor Burlatsky, Academician Arbatov and some others. All of them played a prominent role in perestroika, which ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The very same perestroika was initiated by Mikhail Gorbachev, who came to power in 1985, who was entirely under the influence of Alexander Yakovlev, former ambassador The Soviet Union in Canada, where, according to some sources, he was recruited into the Masonic lodge by the local Prime Minister Maurice Trudeau. And the immediate decision to liquidate the USSR was apparently made in December 1988. Then Gorbachev flew to the United States to take part in a regular UN session. But his speech at the session was not canceled: a strong earthquake happened in Armenia. As Pavel Buzilovich notes on this matter:

“Nevertheless, Gorbachev found time on the same day to have breakfast in a secret atmosphere with the leaders of the“ Trilateral Commission ”David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger. What they had a conversation about, I, of course, do not know. But it is quite possible that it was at this meeting that the fate of our great country was decided. "

After the collapse of the USSR, Freemasonry literally swept over Russia. In August 1992, President Boris Yeltsin signed a decree on the restoration of the Masonic Order of Malta in our country. A year earlier, Yeltsin himself entered this lodge, having been ordained as a knight-commander. And in September 1992, a lodge "Harmony 48 698" appeared in Moscow, which was a branch of French Masonic structures.

Since 1990, the international Masonic club "Rotary International" has developed a vigorous activity in our country. Under his auspices, the International Russian Club was formed, whose members at various times were the heads of Moscow and St. Petersburg Yuri Luzhkov and Anatoly Sobchak, banker Vladimir Gusinsky, television official Eduard Sagalaev, Minister of Justice Nikolai Fedorov (now the Minister of Agriculture of Russia), former Minister of State Security Ivanenko, General Konstantin Kobets and many other figures from the circle of President Yeltsin. The charter of the club looks curious, from which it carries some kind of illegal behavior a mile away: the club has 40 permanent members, and no more than a third can be added every year, and each newcomer must secure three recommendations. The newspaper "Kommersant-Daily" wrote on this occasion:

“The club holds closed meetings and guarantees its members full confidentiality of information received in connection with the club's activities ... deeds, to make the fate of the Fatherland. "

Other similar organizations enjoy no less influence, such as the Magisterium club (the official representative of the Trilateral Commission in Russia), where until recently the former Gorbachev resident Alexander Yakovlev “ruled the ball”, or the Interaction club, where the most prominent liberal politicians - Anatoly Chubais, Konstantin Borovoy, Otto Latsis, Yevgeny Yasin. The Interaction Club, by the way, stood at the origins of the creation of the Democratic Choice of Russia party, which tried to win the State Duma in the 1993 elections. As follows from the report of the Central Election Commission, "Demvybor" received a significant part of its electoral money - 2 billion rubles - from abroad. The investigation of the writer-researcher Oleg Platonov showed that this money came from those foreign structures that are extremely close to Freemasonry ...

This circumstance proves once again that our home-grown "free masons" are under the full influence of their Western "brothers", blindly acting in their interests, which were extremely harshly outlined by a prominent member of the TC Henry Kissinger:

“I would prefer chaos and civil war in Russia to the tendencies of its restoration into a single, strong, centralized state. Russia will be fragmented and under guardianship. "

By the way, the "Trilateral Commission" has repeatedly held seminars, where it invited not only liberal politicians, but also our "oppositionists", like the leader of the communists Gennady Zyuganov or the former co-chairman of the "Congress of Russian Communities", one of the most famous associates of the deceased. General Alexander Lebed Konstantin Zatulin. In this regard, prominent officials of the Putin administration - the former Deputy Chief of the General Staff, and now an influential member of the Federation Council, General Valery Manilov, and the former Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov - did not go unnoticed in this regard.

We do not know how such "interviews" went: who the American Masons attracted to informal cooperation, and who did not. But experts today name two influential Russians who definitely work for the shopping mall. This is a well-known political scientist, chairman of the public organization Council for Foreign and Defense Policy, one of the founders of the United Russia party, a consultant to many Kremlin officials, Sergei Karaganov - the Masonic organization even officially pays his salary. And at the world secret congresses of the TC Russia is represented by the head of RAO "UES of Russia" Anatoly Chubais. He serves the Freemasons not only for liberal ideas, but also for his own income. After all, his personal accounts abroad, according to some ill-wishers of the red-haired privatizer, are not just anywhere, but in the Chase-Manhattan Bank, owned by the founding father of the Commission, David Rockefeller ...

After that, is it any wonder that the position of our country as a raw material appendage of the “golden billion” is strengthening every year, and our rulers often adhere to the anti-Russian policy of “free masons”?

Igor Nevsky, specially for the "Ambassador Prikaz"